QQQM vs XLK: Complete Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF vs Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund โ overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis
Visual Overlap
๐Performance Comparison
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
๐ XLK wins this comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (3)
Bottom line: XLK wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider XLK for your portfolio, but QQQM is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
4 shared holdings representing 45.1% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | QQQM Weight | XLK Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL Apple Inc | 8.85% | 13.10% | 8.85% |
| 2 | MSFT Microsoft Corp | 7.92% | 11.75% | 7.92% |
| 3 | NVDA NVIDIA Corp | 7.45% | 14.84% | 7.45% |
| 4 | AVGO Broadcom Inc | 3.55% | 5.36% | 3.55% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in QQQM
Unique to QQQM
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 5.38% |
| META | Meta Platforms Inc | 3.82% |
| GOOGL | Alphabet Inc Class A | 2.85% |
| GOOG | Alphabet Inc Class C | 2.45% |
| TSLA | Tesla Inc | 2.38% |
Top Holdings Only in XLK
Unique to XLK
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| PLTR | PLTR | 3.75% |
| AMD | AMD | 2.96% |
| ORCL | ORCL | 2.81% |
| MU | MU | 2.72% |
| CSCO | CSCO | 2.60% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.