QQQM vs SPY: Complete Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF vs SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
38.29%
Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
10 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

QQQM
SPY
38.3%
QQQM Only
Overlap
SPY Only

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
QQQM
SPY
1 Year Return
N/A
+26.5%
3 Year Return
N/A
+10.2%
5 Year Return
N/A
+15.8%
Volatility
undefined%
18.20%
Expense Ratio
0.50%
0.09%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš”๏ธ Comparison

2 - 12

๐Ÿ† SPY wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
QQQM:0.50%โœ“
vs
SPY:0.09%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
QQQM:10 holdingsโœ“
vs
SPY:503 holdingsโœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (3)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
QQQM: 46.9% in top 10
SPY: 39.1% in top 10โœ“
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
QQQM: $5B
SPY: $450B โœ“โœ“
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
QQQM: 61.7% uniqueโœ“
SPY: -0.0% unique

Bottom line: SPY wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider SPY for your portfolio, but QQQM is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

10 shared holdings representing 38.3% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockQQQM WeightSPY WeightOverlap
1
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp
7.45%7.73%7.45%
2
AAPL
Apple Inc
8.85%6.82%6.82%
3
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
7.92%6.11%6.11%
4
AMZN
Amazon.com Inc
5.38%3.81%3.81%
5
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc Class A
2.85%3.08%2.85%
6
AVGO
Broadcom Inc
3.55%2.79%2.79%
7
META
Meta Platforms Inc
3.82%2.45%2.45%
8
GOOG
Alphabet Inc Class C
2.45%2.47%2.45%
9
TSLA
Tesla Inc
2.38%2.30%2.30%
10
COST
Costco Wholesale Corp
2.28%0.65%0.65%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
7 stocks ยท 30.92% overlap
Consumer Discretionary
2 stocks ยท 6.11% overlap
Consumer Staples
1 stocks ยท 0.65% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

10
Shared Stocks
38.3%
Total Overlap
3
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in SPY

Unique to SPY

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
BRK-BBRK-B1.55%
JPMJPM1.51%
LLYLLY1.44%
VV1.01%
XOMXOM0.85%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs