QQQM vs VOO: Complete Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
46.72%
Moderate Overlap
Shared Holdings
10 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

QQQM
VOO
46.7%
QQQM Only
Overlap
VOO Only

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
QQQM
VOO
1 Year Return
N/A
+26.5%
3 Year Return
N/A
+10.2%
5 Year Return
N/A
+15.8%
Volatility
undefined%
18.20%
Expense Ratio
0.50%
0.03%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš”๏ธ Comparison

2 - 12

๐Ÿ† VOO wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
QQQM:0.50%โœ“
vs
VOO:0.03%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
QQQM:10 holdingsโœ“
vs
VOO:503 holdingsโœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (3)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
QQQM: 46.9% in top 10
VOO: 39.6% in top 10โœ“
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
QQQM: $5B
VOO: $380B โœ“โœ“
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
QQQM: 61.7% uniqueโœ“
VOO: 18.4% unique

Bottom line: VOO wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VOO for your portfolio, but QQQM is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

10 shared holdings representing 46.7% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockQQQM WeightVOO WeightOverlap
1
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp
7.45%7.37%7.37%
2
AAPL
Apple Inc
8.85%7.07%7.07%
3
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
7.92%6.24%6.24%
4
AMZN
Amazon.com Inc
5.38%3.86%3.86%
5
AVGO
Broadcom Inc
3.55%3.24%3.24%
6
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc Class A
2.85%3.18%2.85%
7
GOOG
Alphabet Inc Class C
2.45%2.55%2.45%
8
META
Meta Platforms Inc
3.82%2.40%2.40%
9
TSLA
Tesla Inc
2.38%2.06%2.06%
10
COST
Costco Wholesale Corp
2.28%0.69%0.69%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
7 stocks ยท 31.62% overlap
Consumer Discretionary
2 stocks ยท 5.92% overlap
Consumer Staples
1 stocks ยท 0.69% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

10
Shared Stocks
46.7%
Total Overlap
3
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in VOO

Unique to VOO

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
BRK-BBRK-B1.61%
LLYLLY1.46%
JPMJPM1.40%
VV0.96%
JNJJNJ0.85%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs