QQQM vs IWM: Complete Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF — overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

QQQM
IWM
0.0%
QQQM Only
Overlap
IWM Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

QQQM Return
+13.76%
IWM Return
+8.85%
Winner
QQQM
+4.91%
Max Drawdown
QQQM: -11.7%
IWM: -11.0%
QQQM Volatility (annualized)18.60%
IWM Volatility (annualized)20.28%

📈 Comparison

Metric
QQQM
IWM
1 Year Return
N/A
+18.5%
3 Year Return
N/A
+4.2%
5 Year Return
N/A
+10.5%
Volatility
undefined%
24.80%
Expense Ratio
0.50%
0.19%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚔️ Comparison

0 - 14

🏆 IWM wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
QQQM:0.50%
vs
IWM:0.19%
🎯 Number of Holdings
QQQM:10 holdings
vs
IWM:1,983 holdings
Additional Metrics (3)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
QQQM: 46.9% in top 10
IWM: 5.3% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
QQQM: $5B
IWM: $60B ✓
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
QQQM: 61.7% unique
IWM: 100.0% unique

Bottom line: IWM wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider IWM for your portfolio, but QQQM is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockQQQM WeightIWM WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in QQQM

Unique to QQQM

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
AAPLApple Inc8.85%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.92%
NVDANVIDIA Corp7.45%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc5.38%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.82%

Top Holdings Only in IWM

Unique to IWM

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
CRDOCREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING LTD0.86%
BEBLOOM ENERGY CLASS A CORP0.80%
FNFABRINET0.62%
IONQIONQ INC0.51%
NXTNEXTPOWER INC CLASS A0.44%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on QQQM or IWM?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs