QQQM vs DIA: Complete Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF vs SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
10.52%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
1 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

QQQM
DIA
10.5%
QQQM Only
Overlap
DIA Only

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
QQQM
DIA
1 Year Return
N/A
+22.8%
3 Year Return
N/A
+8.5%
5 Year Return
N/A
+13.2%
Volatility
undefined%
17.50%
Expense Ratio
0.50%
0.16%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš”๏ธ Comparison

2 - 12

๐Ÿ† DIA wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
QQQM:0.50%โœ“
vs
DIA:0.16%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
QQQM:10 holdingsโœ“
vs
DIA:30 holdingsโœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (3)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
QQQM: 46.9% in top 10โœ“
DIA: 65.1% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
QQQM: $5B
DIA: $35Bโœ“
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
QQQM: 61.7% unique
DIA: 89.5% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: DIA wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider DIA for your portfolio, but QQQM is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

1 shared holdings representing 10.5% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockQQQM WeightDIA WeightOverlap
1
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
7.92%6.85%6.85%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
1 stocks ยท 6.85% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

1
Shared Stocks
10.5%
Total Overlap
1
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in QQQM

Unique to QQQM

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
AAPLApple Inc8.85%
NVDANVIDIA Corp7.45%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc5.38%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.82%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.55%

Top Holdings Only in DIA

Unique to DIA

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
UNHUnitedHealth Group9.85%
GSGoldman Sachs8.25%
HDHome Depot6.65%
CATCaterpillar Inc6.25%
AMGNAmgen Inc5.85%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs