🏆 Best ETFs of 2025

Data-driven rankings across all major categories

Ranked among 84+ popular ETFs in our curated selection. Methodology based on expense ratios, AUM, performance, and risk metrics.

✓ Transparent methodology
✓ Updated regularly
✓ Objective data
6
Ranking Categories
84+
ETFs Reviewed
0.03%
Lowest Fees Found

🏅Best S&P 500 ETFs

Track America's 500 largest companies with the lowest fees

â„šī¸ Methodology
đŸĨ‡
SPY90.5/100

Most liquid but 3x higher fees. Best for day traders, not long-term holders.

expense Ratio:0.09%
aum:$450B
inception Year:1993
đŸĨˆ
IVV89.4/100

Ultra-low 0.03% fee + massive liquidity. Perfect for buy-and-hold.

expense Ratio:0.03%
aum:$400B
inception Year:2000
đŸĨ‰
VOO82.0/100

Ultra-low 0.03% fee + massive liquidity. Perfect for buy-and-hold.

expense Ratio:0.03%
aum:$380B
inception Year:2010
4.
SPLG1.5/100

Same 0.03% fee as VOO/IVV but smaller AUM. Great budget option.

expense Ratio:0.50%
aum:$5B
inception Year:2024
💡

Key Insight: VOO and IVV tie for best value. SPY costs $60 more per $10K invested annually due to higher fees.

đŸ’ĩBest Dividend ETFs

Highest quality dividend payers with sustainable growth

â„šī¸ Methodology
đŸĨ‡
VIG96.1/100

Dividend growth focus: only companies with 10+ years of increases.

expense Ratio:0.05%
return1 Y:22.5%
sharpe Ratio:0.82
đŸĨˆ
DGRO90.0/100

expense Ratio:0.08%
return1 Y:22.5%
sharpe Ratio:0.72
đŸĨ‰
SCHD85.6/100

King of dividends: 3.5% yield + 10-year growth streak + quality focus.

expense Ratio:0.06%
return1 Y:18.5%
sharpe Ratio:0.75
4.
VYM82.5/100

Lower fees (0.06%) + broad diversification across 400+ dividend payers.

expense Ratio:0.06%
return1 Y:18.8%
sharpe Ratio:0.65
5.
HDV73.0/100

expense Ratio:0.08%
return1 Y:15.8%
sharpe Ratio:0.58
💡

Key Insight: SCHD combines yield, growth, and quality screening. Outperformed S&P 500 over 10 years.

🚀Top Tech ETFs

Capture tech sector growth with lower fees

â„šī¸ Methodology
đŸĨ‡
XLK83.8/100

expense Ratio:0.10%
return1 Y:35.2%
sharpe Ratio:1.05
đŸĨˆ
VGT82.6/100

Lower fees (0.10% vs 0.20%) + broader tech exposure (300+ holdings).

expense Ratio:0.10%
return1 Y:34.8%
sharpe Ratio:1.02
đŸĨ‰
SMH69.5/100

Pure semiconductor play: highest risk/reward in tech sector.

expense Ratio:0.35%
return1 Y:45.2%
sharpe Ratio:0.88
4.
SOXX66.3/100

Pure semiconductor play: highest risk/reward in tech sector.

expense Ratio:0.35%
return1 Y:42.5%
sharpe Ratio:0.85
5.
QQQ65.5/100

Nasdaq 100: FANG+ dominance. 50% in top 10 = concentrated but powerful.

expense Ratio:0.20%
return1 Y:28.2%
sharpe Ratio:0.88
💡

Key Insight: VGT beats QQQ on fees (0.10% vs 0.20%) with similar performance. Save $100/year per $10K invested.

đŸŽ¯Most Diversified ETFs

Broadest market exposure with lowest single-stock risk

â„šī¸ Methodology
đŸĨ‡
VTI98.2/100

3,600+ holdings = entire US market. No sector >30%. Ultimate diversification.

holdings:3,658
expense Ratio:0.03%
aum:$320B
đŸĨˆ
ITOT79.5/100

Similar to VTI with 3,500+ holdings. Identical performance, slightly lower liquidity.

holdings:3,500
expense Ratio:0.03%
aum:$55B
đŸĨ‰
SCHB64.1/100

holdings:2,500
expense Ratio:0.03%
aum:$28B
4.
IWB33.6/100

holdings:1,003
expense Ratio:0.20%
aum:$30B
5.
VT1.7/100

holdings:100
expense Ratio:0.50%
aum:$5B
💡

Key Insight: VTI offers true diversification: 3,600+ stocks, no sector >30%, covers 100% of US market cap.

💰Lowest Expense Ratios

Pay less, keep more. Fees compound against you.

â„šī¸ Methodology
đŸĨ‡
IVV58.0/100

Saves $1,410 over 30 years vs 0.50% average fee.

expense Ratio:0.03%
aum:$400B
category:Stocks
đŸĨˆ
VOO56.5/100

Saves $1,410 over 30 years vs 0.50% average fee.

expense Ratio:0.03%
aum:$380B
category:Stocks
đŸĨ‰
VTI52.0/100

Saves $1,410 over 30 years vs 0.50% average fee.

expense Ratio:0.03%
aum:$320B
category:Stocks
4.
BND35.9/100

Saves $1,410 over 30 years vs 0.50% average fee.

expense Ratio:0.03%
aum:$105B
category:Bonds
5.
AGG35.1/100

Saves $1,410 over 30 years vs 0.50% average fee.

expense Ratio:0.03%
aum:$95B
category:Stocks
💡

Key Insight: 0.03% fees are now standard. Paying 0.50%+ means losing 15%+ of your returns over 30 years.

🌍Best International ETFs

Global diversification beyond US borders

â„šī¸ Methodology
đŸĨ‡
VXUS82.1/100

Total international (developed + emerging) in one fund. 8,000+ holdings.

expense Ratio:0.07%
holdings:8,154
aum:$65B
đŸĨˆ
VEA81.5/100

Developed markets: 0.05% fee = 90% cheaper than EFA with same exposure.

expense Ratio:0.05%
holdings:3,929
aum:$120B
đŸĨ‰
VWO74.5/100

Emerging markets leader: China, India, Brazil. Higher risk/reward.

expense Ratio:0.08%
holdings:5,219
aum:$80B
4.
IEMG65.8/100

expense Ratio:0.09%
holdings:2,679
aum:$85B
5.
VEU60.6/100

expense Ratio:0.04%
holdings:3,865
aum:$35B
💡

Key Insight: VEA costs 90% less than EFA (0.05% vs 0.32%) for the same developed market exposure.

How We Rank ETFs

📊Data-Driven

Rankings based on objective metrics: expense ratios, AUM, performance history, Sharpe ratios, and diversification stats. No sponsor bias.

âš–ī¸Weighted Scoring

Each category uses custom weightings. For example, S&P 500 ETFs prioritize fees (50%) over liquidity (30%) and track record (20%).

🔄Regular Updates

Rankings updated as new performance data becomes available. Methodology refined based on user feedback and market changes.

đŸŽ¯Curated Selection

We focus on major, liquid ETFs with strong track records. Our 84+ fund selection covers 95% of investor needs across all asset classes.

âš ī¸Important Disclaimer

Rankings are based on our curated selection of 84+ major ETFs and should not be considered comprehensive across all 4,700+ ETFs available. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always consider your personal financial situation, goals, and risk tolerance before investing. Not financial advice.

Compare Any ETFs →

Use our comparison tool to dive deeper into any ETF