ITOT vs XLF Overlap AnalysisOverlap
Comparing iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
๐Performance Comparison
โ ๏ธRisk Metrics
Interpretation:
- ๐ Lower volatility = smoother ride
- โก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- โ ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- ๐ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
๐ ITOT wins this comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: ITOT wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider ITOT for your portfolio, but XLF is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
71 shared holdings representing 11.6% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | ITOT Weight | XLF Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRK-B BRK-B | 1.38% | 11.80% | 1.38% |
| 2 | JPM JPM | 1.31% | 10.82% | 1.31% |
| 3 | V V | 0.86% | 7.26% | 0.86% |
| 4 | MA MA | 0.69% | 5.81% | 0.69% |
| 5 | BAC BAC | 0.55% | 4.78% | 0.55% |
| 6 | WFC WFC | 0.42% | 3.73% | 0.42% |
| 7 | GS GS | 0.36% | 3.47% | 0.36% |
| 8 | AXP AXP | 0.30% | 2.59% | 0.30% |
| 9 | MS MS | 0.30% | 2.84% | 0.30% |
| 10 | C C | 0.28% | 2.64% | 0.28% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in ITOT
Unique to ITOT
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVDA | 7.33% |
| AAPL | AAPL | 6.04% |
| MSFT | MSFT | 5.68% |
| AMZN | AMZN | 3.64% |
| GOOGL | GOOGL | 2.55% |
Top Holdings Only in XLF
Unique to XLF
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| ICE | ICE | 1.18% |
| NDAQ | NDAQ | 0.54% |
| SYF | SYF | 0.39% |
| FDS | FDS | 0.14% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.