ITOT vs DIA Overlap

Comparing iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF

Holdings Overlap
9.63%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
10 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

ITOT
DIA
9.6%
ITOT Only
Overlap
DIA Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

ITOT Return
+8.50%
DIA Return
+9.12%
Winner
DIA
+0.61%
Max Drawdown
ITOT: -5.4%
DIA: -5.1%
ITOT Volatility (annualized)11.87%
DIA Volatility (annualized)10.72%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
ITOT
DIA
1 Year Return
+25.8%โœ“
+22.8%
3 Year Return
+9.8%โœ“
+8.5%
5 Year Return
+15.2%โœ“
+13.2%
Volatility
18.80%
17.50%โœ“
Expense Ratio
0.03%โœ“
0.16%
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
ITOT
DIA
Volatility
18.80%
17.50%โœ“
Sharpe Ratio
0.78โœ“
0.71
Sortino Ratio
1.05
1.02
Max Drawdown
-34.20%โœ“
-36.80%
Beta
1.01
0.92

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

10 - 3

๐Ÿ† ITOT wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
ITOT:0.03%โœ“
vs
DIA:0.16%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
ITOT:3,500 holdingsโœ“
vs
DIA:30 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
ITOT:+15.2%
vs
DIA:+13.2%
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
ITOT: 35.2% in top 10โœ“
DIA: 65.1% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
ITOT: $55B โœ“โœ“
DIA: $35B
โšก Sharpe Ratio
ITOT: 0.78
DIA: 0.71
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
ITOT: 18.8%
DIA: 17.5%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
ITOT: 12.8% unique
DIA: 89.5% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: ITOT wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider ITOT for your portfolio, but DIA is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

10 shared holdings representing 9.6% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockITOT WeightDIA WeightOverlap
1
MSFT
MSFT
5.68%6.85%5.68%
2
V
V
0.86%5.65%0.86%
3
HD
HD
0.56%6.65%0.56%
4
UNH
UNH
0.44%9.85%0.44%
5
CAT
CAT
0.40%6.25%0.40%
6
GS
GS
0.36%8.25%0.36%
7
CRM
CRM
0.35%5.45%0.35%
8
MCD
MCD
0.32%5.25%0.32%
9
AMGN
AMGN
0.26%5.85%0.26%
10
BA
BA
0.22%5.05%0.22%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
2 stocks ยท 6.03% overlap
Financials
2 stocks ยท 1.22% overlap
Consumer Discretionary
2 stocks ยท 0.88% overlap
Healthcare
2 stocks ยท 0.70% overlap
Industrials
2 stocks ยท 0.62% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

10
Shared Stocks
9.6%
Total Overlap
5
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in ITOT

Unique to ITOT

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA7.33%
AAPLAAPL6.04%
AMZNAMZN3.64%
GOOGLGOOGL2.55%
AVGOAVGO2.54%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs