XLK vs XLV: Complete Comparison

Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund vs Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund — overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 60
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

XLK
XLV
0.0%
XLK Only
Overlap
XLV Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

XLK Return
+20.44%
XLV Return
-8.75%
Winner
XLK
+29.19%
Max Drawdown
XLK: -14.5%
XLV: -10.5%
XLK Volatility (annualized)25.10%
XLV Volatility (annualized)14.75%

📈 Comparison

Metric
XLK
XLV
1 Year Return
+35.2%
+12.5%
3 Year Return
+15.8%
+6.8%
5 Year Return
+25.5%
+11.2%
Volatility
24.20%
15.80%
Expense Ratio
0.10%
0.10%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚠️Risk Metrics

Metric
XLK
XLV
Volatility
24.20%
15.80%
Sharpe Ratio
1.05
0.68
Sortino Ratio
1.42
0.95
Max Drawdown
-38.50%
-25.20%
Beta
1.22
0.72

Interpretation:

  • 📊 Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • ⚡ Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • ⚠️ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • 📈 Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

⚔️ Comparison

10 - 4

🏆 XLK wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
XLK:0.10%
vs
XLV:0.10%
🎯 Number of Holdings
XLK:65 holdings
vs
XLV:64 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
XLK:+25.5%
vs
XLV:+11.2%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
XLK: 62.3% in top 10
XLV: 57.5% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
XLK: $55B ✓
XLV: $35B
Sharpe Ratio
XLK: 1.05
XLV: 0.68
📉 Volatility
XLK: 24.2%
XLV: 15.8%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
XLK: 65.5% unique
XLV: 90.5% unique

Bottom line: XLK wins with better number of holdings and 5-year return. Both have the same expense ratio, so cost isn't a differentiator. Consider XLK for your portfolio, but XLV is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockXLK WeightXLV WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in XLK

Unique to XLK

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA14.84%
AAPLAAPL13.10%
MSFTMSFT11.75%
AVGOAVGO5.36%
PLTRPLTR3.75%

Top Holdings Only in XLV

Unique to XLV

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
LLYLLY14.33%
JNJJNJ8.84%
ABBVABBV7.23%
UNHUNH5.38%
MRKMRK4.44%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on XLK or XLV?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs