XLK vs VTI Overlap

Comparing Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

Holdings Overlap
39.74%
Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
3 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

XLK
VTI
39.7%
XLK Only
Overlap
VTI Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

XLK Return
+12.16%
VTI Return
+8.62%
Winner
XLK
+3.54%
Max Drawdown
XLK: -10.5%
VTI: -5.3%
XLK Volatility (annualized)19.66%
VTI Volatility (annualized)11.82%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
XLK
VTI
1 Year Return
+35.2%โœ“
+25.8%
3 Year Return
+15.8%โœ“
+9.8%
5 Year Return
+25.5%โœ“
+15.2%
Volatility
24.20%
19.10%โœ“
Expense Ratio
0.10%
0.03%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
XLK
VTI
Volatility
24.20%
19.10%โœ“
Sharpe Ratio
1.05โœ“
0.75
Sortino Ratio
1.42โœ“
1.08
Max Drawdown
-38.50%
-34.50%โœ“
Beta
1.22
1.02

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

8 - 10

๐Ÿ† VTI wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
XLK:0.10%โœ“
vs
VTI:0.03%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
XLK:65 holdingsโœ“
vs
VTI:3,658 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
XLK:+25.5%โœ“
vs
VTI:+15.2%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
XLK: 62.3% in top 10
VTI: 27.8% in top 10โœ“
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
XLK: $55B โœ“
VTI: $320B โœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
XLK: 1.05โœ“
VTI: 0.75
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
XLK: 24.2%
VTI: 19.1%โœ“
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
XLK: 65.5% uniqueโœ“
VTI: 63.6% unique

Bottom line: VTI wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VTI for your portfolio, but XLK is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

3 shared holdings representing 39.7% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockXLK WeightVTI WeightOverlap
1
AAPL
AAPL
13.10%5.80%5.80%
2
MSFT
MSFT
11.75%5.45%5.45%
3
NVDA
NVDA
14.84%4.25%4.25%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
3 stocks ยท 15.50% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

3
Shared Stocks
39.7%
Total Overlap
1
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in XLK

Unique to XLK

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
AVGOAVGO5.36%
PLTRPLTR3.75%
AMDAMD2.96%
ORCLORCL2.81%
MUMU2.72%

Top Holdings Only in VTI

Unique to VTI

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
AMZNAmazon.com Inc3.00%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.02%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc Class A1.77%
GOOGAlphabet Inc Class C1.52%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Class B1.44%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs