XLK vs DIA Overlap Analysis

Comparing Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF

Holdings Overlap
14.65%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
2 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

XLK
DIA
14.6%
XLK Only
Overlap
DIA Only

⚔️Head-to-Head Comparison

14 - 4

🏆 XLK wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
XLK:0.10%
vs
DIA:0.16%
🎯 Number of Holdings
XLK:65 holdings
vs
DIA:30 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
XLK:+25.5%
vs
DIA:+13.2%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
XLK: 0.8% in top 10
DIA: 0.7% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
XLK: $55B ✓
DIA: $35B
Sharpe Ratio
XLK: 1.05
DIA: 0.71
📉 Volatility
XLK: 24.2%
DIA: 17.5%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
XLK: 73.2% unique
DIA: 89.5% unique

Bottom line: XLK wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings and 5-year return. Consider XLK for your portfolio, but DIA is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Shared Holdings (2 of 10 analyzed)

XLK & DIA Intersection

SymbolNameXLKDIAMin
MSFTMicrosoft Corp0.20%0.07%0.07%
CRMSalesforce Inc0.03%0.05%0.03%

Min Weight: The minimum weight between the two ETFs for each shared holding. This represents the true overlap contribution.

Data sourced from official fund providers. Showing top holdings for educational analysis.

Top Holdings Only in XLK

Unique to XLK

SymbolNameWeight
AAPLApple Inc0.21%
NVDANVIDIA Corp0.16%
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.05%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices0.03%
ORCLOracle Corp0.03%

Top Holdings Only in DIA

Unique to DIA

SymbolNameWeight
UNHUnitedHealth Group0.10%
GSGoldman Sachs0.08%
HDHome Depot0.07%
CATCaterpillar Inc0.06%
AMGNAmgen Inc0.06%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs