VYM vs XLV: Complete Comparison
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund โ overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis
Visual Overlap
๐Performance Comparison
โ ๏ธRisk Metrics
Interpretation:
- ๐ Lower volatility = smoother ride
- โก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- โ ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- ๐ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
๐ VYM wins this comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: VYM wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VYM for your portfolio, but XLV is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
3 shared holdings representing 20.6% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | VYM Weight | XLV Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.51% | 8.84% | 2.51% |
| 2 | ABBV AbbVie Inc | 2.38% | 7.23% | 2.38% |
| 3 | MRK Merck & Co Inc | 2.15% | 4.44% | 2.15% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in VYM
Unique to VYM
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc | 4.52% |
| JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co | 3.82% |
| XOM | Exxon Mobil Corp | 3.24% |
| PG | Procter & Gamble Co | 2.65% |
| HD | Home Depot Inc | 2.58% |
Top Holdings Only in XLV
Unique to XLV
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| LLY | LLY | 14.33% |
| UNH | UNH | 5.38% |
| TMO | TMO | 3.90% |
| ABT | ABT | 3.87% |
| ISRG | ISRG | 3.67% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.