VYM vs VOO: Complete Comparison

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
9.49%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
6 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

VYM
VOO
9.5%
VYM Only
Overlap
VOO Only

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
VYM
VOO
1 Year Return
+18.8%
+26.5%โœ“
3 Year Return
+8.2%
+10.2%โœ“
5 Year Return
+11.5%
+15.8%โœ“
Volatility
16.80%โœ“
18.20%
Expense Ratio
0.06%
0.03%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
VYM
VOO
Volatility
16.80%โœ“
18.20%
Sharpe Ratio
0.65
0.82โœ“
Sortino Ratio
0.88
1.15โœ“
Max Drawdown
-34.50%
-33.80%โœ“
Beta
0.85
1.00

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

4 - 12

๐Ÿ† VOO wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
VYM:0.06%โœ“
vs
VOO:0.03%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
VYM:475 holdingsโœ“
vs
VOO:503 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
VYM:+11.5%โœ“
vs
VOO:+15.8%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
VYM: 27.7% in top 10โœ“
VOO: 39.6% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
VYM: $55B โœ“
VOO: $380B โœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
VYM: 0.65
VOO: 0.82โœ“
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
VYM: 16.8%
VOO: 18.2%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
VYM: 90.2% uniqueโœ“
VOO: 18.4% unique

Bottom line: VOO wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings and 5-year return. Consider VOO for your portfolio, but VYM is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

6 shared holdings representing 9.5% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockVYM WeightVOO WeightOverlap
1
AVGO
Broadcom Inc
4.52%3.24%3.24%
2
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co
3.82%1.40%1.40%
3
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.51%0.85%0.85%
4
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corp
3.24%0.84%0.84%
5
WMT
Walmart Inc
1.98%0.83%0.83%
6
ABBV
AbbVie Inc
2.38%0.69%0.69%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
1 stocks ยท 3.24% overlap
Healthcare
2 stocks ยท 1.54% overlap
Financials
1 stocks ยท 1.40% overlap
Energy
1 stocks ยท 0.84% overlap
Consumer Staples
1 stocks ยท 0.83% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

6
Shared Stocks
9.5%
Total Overlap
5
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in VYM

Unique to VYM

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
PGProcter & Gamble Co2.65%
HDHome Depot Inc2.58%
MRKMerck & Co Inc2.15%
BACBank of America Corp1.85%

Top Holdings Only in VOO

Unique to VOO

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA7.37%
AAPLAAPL7.07%
MSFTMSFT6.24%
AMZNAMZN3.86%
GOOGLGOOGL3.18%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs