VYM vs XLK: Complete Comparison

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
5.37%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
1 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

VYM
XLK
5.4%
VYM Only
Overlap
XLK Only

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
VYM
XLK
1 Year Return
+18.8%
+35.2%โœ“
3 Year Return
+8.2%
+15.8%โœ“
5 Year Return
+11.5%
+25.5%โœ“
Volatility
16.80%โœ“
24.20%
Expense Ratio
0.06%โœ“
0.10%
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
VYM
XLK
Volatility
16.80%โœ“
24.20%
Sharpe Ratio
0.65
1.05โœ“
Sortino Ratio
0.88
1.42โœ“
Max Drawdown
-34.50%โœ“
-38.50%
Beta
0.85
1.22

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

12 - 6

๐Ÿ† VYM wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
VYM:0.06%โœ“
vs
XLK:0.10%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
VYM:475 holdingsโœ“
vs
XLK:65 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
VYM:+11.5%โœ“
vs
XLK:+25.5%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
VYM: 27.7% in top 10โœ“
XLK: 62.3% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
VYM: $55B โœ“
XLK: $55B โœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
VYM: 0.65
XLK: 1.05โœ“
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
VYM: 16.8%โœ“
XLK: 24.2%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
VYM: 90.2% uniqueโœ“
XLK: 65.5% unique

Bottom line: VYM wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VYM for your portfolio, but XLK is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

1 shared holdings representing 5.4% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockVYM WeightXLK WeightOverlap
1
AVGO
Broadcom Inc
4.52%5.36%4.52%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
1 stocks ยท 4.52% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

1
Shared Stocks
5.4%
Total Overlap
1
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in VYM

Unique to VYM

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co3.82%
XOMExxon Mobil Corp3.24%
PGProcter & Gamble Co2.65%
HDHome Depot Inc2.58%
JNJJohnson & Johnson2.51%

Top Holdings Only in XLK

Unique to XLK

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA14.84%
AAPLAAPL13.10%
MSFTMSFT11.75%
PLTRPLTR3.75%
AMDAMD2.96%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs