RYLD vs XLF: Complete Comparison

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF vs Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund — overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

RYLD
XLF
0.0%
RYLD Only
Overlap
XLF Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

RYLD Return
+8.56%
XLF Return
+6.68%
Winner
RYLD
+1.87%
Max Drawdown
RYLD: -4.5%
XLF: -5.6%
RYLD Volatility (annualized)10.42%
XLF Volatility (annualized)13.17%

📈 Comparison

Metric
RYLD
XLF
1 Year Return
+18.5%
+28.5%
3 Year Return
+5.2%
+10.5%
5 Year Return
N/A
+14.8%
Volatility
18.50%
21.50%
Expense Ratio
0.60%
0.10%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚠️Risk Metrics

Metric
RYLD
XLF
Volatility
18.50%
21.50%
Sharpe Ratio
0.48
0.65
Sortino Ratio
0.65
0.88
Max Drawdown
-35.50%
-55.20%
Beta
0.82
1.12

Interpretation:

  • 📊 Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • ⚡ Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • ⚠️ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • 📈 Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

⚔️ Comparison

7 - 9

🏆 XLF wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
RYLD:0.60%
vs
XLF:0.10%
🎯 Number of Holdings
RYLD:2,000 holdings
vs
XLF:68 holdings
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
RYLD: 50.6% in top 10
XLF: 55.7% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
RYLD: $1.5B
XLF: $40B
Sharpe Ratio
RYLD: 0.48
XLF: 0.65
📉 Volatility
RYLD: 18.5%
XLF: 21.5%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
RYLD: 99.7% unique
XLF: 86.3% unique

Bottom line: XLF wins with better expense ratio. Consider XLF for your portfolio, but RYLD is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockRYLD WeightXLF WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in RYLD

Unique to RYLD

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
IWMRussell 2000 Index (via derivatives)45.00%
SMCISuper Micro Computer1.20%
MSTRMicroStrategy Inc0.90%
ANFAbercrombie & Fitch0.70%
BOOTBoot Barn Holdings0.60%

Top Holdings Only in XLF

Unique to XLF

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
BRK-BBRK-B11.80%
JPMJPM10.82%
VV7.26%
MAMA5.81%
BACBAC4.78%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on RYLD or XLF?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs