RYLD vs IWM: Complete Comparison

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.37%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
2 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

RYLD
IWM
0.4%
RYLD Only
Overlap
IWM Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

RYLD Return
+8.56%
IWM Return
+12.41%
Winner
IWM
+3.85%
Max Drawdown
RYLD: -4.5%
IWM: -8.5%
RYLD Volatility (annualized)10.42%
IWM Volatility (annualized)19.30%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
RYLD
IWM
1 Year Return
+18.5%
+18.5%
3 Year Return
+5.2%โœ“
+4.2%
5 Year Return
N/A
+10.5%
Volatility
18.50%โœ“
24.80%
Expense Ratio
0.60%
0.19%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
RYLD
IWM
Volatility
18.50%โœ“
24.80%
Sharpe Ratio
0.48โœ“
0.38
Sortino Ratio
0.65โœ“
0.52
Max Drawdown
-35.50%โœ“
-41.50%
Beta
0.82
1.25

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

5 - 11

๐Ÿ† IWM wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
RYLD:0.60%โœ“
vs
IWM:0.19%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
RYLD:2,000 holdingsโœ“
vs
IWM:1,983 holdingsโœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
RYLD: 50.6% in top 10
IWM: 5.3% in top 10โœ“
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
RYLD: $1.5B
IWM: $60B โœ“โœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
RYLD: 0.48
IWM: 0.38
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
RYLD: 18.5%โœ“
IWM: 24.8%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
RYLD: 99.7% unique
IWM: 100.0% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: IWM wins with better expense ratio. Consider IWM for your portfolio, but RYLD is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

2 shared holdings representing 0.4% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockRYLD WeightIWM WeightOverlap
1
BOOT
Boot Barn Holdings
0.60%0.21%0.21%
2
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch
0.70%0.16%0.16%

Overlap by Sector

Other
2 stocks ยท 0.37% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

2
Shared Stocks
0.4%
Total Overlap
1
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in RYLD

Unique to RYLD

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
IWMRussell 2000 Index (via derivatives)45.00%
SMCISuper Micro Computer1.20%
MSTRMicroStrategy Inc0.90%
CVNACarvana Co0.50%
CELHCelsius Holdings0.50%

Top Holdings Only in IWM

Unique to IWM

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
CRDOCREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING LTD0.86%
BEBLOOM ENERGY CLASS A CORP0.80%
FNFABRINET0.62%
IONQIONQ INC0.51%
NXTNEXTPOWER INC CLASS A0.44%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on RYLD or IWM?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs