RYLD vs SPY: Complete Comparison

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF vs SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.31%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
4 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

RYLD
SPY
0.3%
RYLD Only
Overlap
SPY Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

RYLD Return
+8.56%
SPY Return
+8.52%
Winner
RYLD
+0.03%
Max Drawdown
RYLD: -4.5%
SPY: -5.1%
RYLD Volatility (annualized)10.42%
SPY Volatility (annualized)11.46%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
RYLD
SPY
1 Year Return
+18.5%
+26.5%โœ“
3 Year Return
+5.2%
+10.2%โœ“
5 Year Return
N/A
+15.8%
Volatility
18.50%
18.20%โœ“
Expense Ratio
0.60%
0.09%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
RYLD
SPY
Volatility
18.50%
18.20%โœ“
Sharpe Ratio
0.48
0.82โœ“
Sortino Ratio
0.65
1.15โœ“
Max Drawdown
-35.50%
-33.90%โœ“
Beta
0.82
1.00

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

5 - 11

๐Ÿ† SPY wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
RYLD:0.60%โœ“
vs
SPY:0.09%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
RYLD:2,000 holdingsโœ“
vs
SPY:503 holdingsโœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
RYLD: 50.6% in top 10
SPY: 39.1% in top 10โœ“
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
RYLD: $1.5B
SPY: $450B โœ“โœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
RYLD: 0.48
SPY: 0.82โœ“
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
RYLD: 18.5%
SPY: 18.2%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
RYLD: 99.7% uniqueโœ“
SPY: -0.0% unique

Bottom line: SPY wins with better expense ratio. Consider SPY for your portfolio, but RYLD is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

4 shared holdings representing 0.3% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockRYLD WeightSPY WeightOverlap
1
CVNA
Carvana Co
0.50%0.11%0.11%
2
AXON
Axon Enterprise
0.40%0.08%0.08%
3
SMCI
Super Micro Computer
1.20%0.06%0.06%
4
TPL
Texas Pacific Land
0.40%0.06%0.06%

Overlap by Sector

Other
4 stocks ยท 0.31% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

4
Shared Stocks
0.3%
Total Overlap
1
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in RYLD

Unique to RYLD

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
IWMRussell 2000 Index (via derivatives)45.00%
MSTRMicroStrategy Inc0.90%
ANFAbercrombie & Fitch0.70%
BOOTBoot Barn Holdings0.60%
CELHCelsius Holdings0.50%

Top Holdings Only in SPY

Unique to SPY

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA7.73%
AAPLAAPL6.82%
MSFTMSFT6.11%
AMZNAMZN3.81%
GOOGLGOOGL3.08%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on RYLD or SPY?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs