QQQ vs VOOG: Complete Comparison
Invesco QQQ Trust vs Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF โ overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
๐Performance Comparison
โ ๏ธRisk Metrics
Interpretation:
- ๐ Lower volatility = smoother ride
- โก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- โ ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- ๐ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
๐ QQQ wins this comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: QQQ wins with better . Consider QQQ for your portfolio, but VOOG is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
51 shared holdings representing 56.2% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | QQQ Weight | VOOG Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA NVDA | 8.99% | 15.31% | 8.99% |
| 2 | MSFT MSFT | 7.12% | 6.20% | 6.20% |
| 3 | AAPL AAPL | 7.94% | 5.72% | 5.72% |
| 4 | AMZN AMZN | 4.87% | 4.26% | 4.26% |
| 5 | TSLA TSLA | 4.21% | 3.97% | 3.97% |
| 6 | META META | 3.85% | 4.36% | 3.85% |
| 7 | GOOGL GOOGL | 3.58% | 5.07% | 3.58% |
| 8 | GOOG GOOG | 3.35% | 4.08% | 3.35% |
| 9 | AVGO AVGO | 3.24% | 5.39% | 3.24% |
| 10 | NFLX NFLX | 2.15% | 1.47% | 1.47% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in QQQ
Unique to QQQ
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| AMD | AMD | 1.90% |
| MU | MU | 1.75% |
| CSCO | CSCO | 1.67% |
| LRCX | LRCX | 1.21% |
| SHOP | SHOP | 1.12% |
Top Holdings Only in VOOG
Unique to VOOG
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| LLY | LLY | 2.13% |
| V | V | 1.79% |
| JPM | JPM | 1.51% |
| MA | MA | 1.41% |
| ORCL | ORCL | 1.35% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.
Want deeper analysis on QQQ or VOOG?
Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.
Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.