QQQ vs VTI Overlap Analysis

Comparing Invesco QQQ Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

Holdings Overlap
44.86%
Moderate Overlap
Shared Holdings
8 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

QQQ
VTI
44.9%
QQQ Only
Overlap
VTI Only

⚔️Head-to-Head Comparison

4 - 12

🏆 VTI wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
QQQ:0.20%
vs
VTI:0.03%
🎯 Number of Holdings
QQQ:101 holdings
vs
VTI:3,658 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
QQQ:+20.1%
vs
VTI:+15.2%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
QQQ: 53.5% in top 10
VTI: 0.3% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
QQQ: $220B ✓
VTI: $320B ✓
Sharpe Ratio
QQQ: 0.88
VTI: 0.75
📉 Volatility
QQQ: 22.5%
VTI: 19.1%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
QQQ: 47.5% unique
VTI: 63.4% unique

Bottom line: VTI wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VTI for your portfolio, but QQQ is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Shared Holdings (8 of 10 analyzed)

QQQ & VTI Intersection

SymbolNameQQQVTIMin
AAPLAAPL8.94%0.06%0.06%
MSFTMSFT7.66%0.05%0.05%
NVDANVDA9.28%0.04%0.04%
AMZNAMZN5.26%0.03%0.03%
METAMETA2.95%0.02%0.02%
GOOGLGOOGL3.87%0.02%0.02%
GOOGGOOG3.61%0.02%0.02%
TSLATSLA3.29%0.01%0.01%

Min Weight: The minimum weight between the two ETFs for each shared holding. This represents the true overlap contribution.

Data sourced from official fund providers. Showing top holdings for educational analysis.

Top Holdings Only in QQQ

Unique to QQQ

SymbolNameWeight
AVGOAVGO6.25%
NFLXNFLX2.41%
COSTCOST2.12%
PLTRPLTR2.01%
AMDAMD1.81%

Top Holdings Only in VTI

Unique to VTI

SymbolNameWeight
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Class B0.01%
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co0.01%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs