QQQ vs VOO Overlap Analysis

Comparing Invesco QQQ Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Holdings Overlap
53.01%
Moderate Overlap
Shared Holdings
89 of 102
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

QQQ
VOO
53.0%
QQQ Only
Overlap
VOO Only

⚔️Head-to-Head Comparison

6 - 10

🏆 VOO wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
QQQ:0.20%
vs
VOO:0.03%
🎯 Number of Holdings
QQQ:101 holdings
vs
VOO:503 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
QQQ:+20.1%
vs
VOO:+15.8%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
QQQ: 53.5% in top 10
VOO: 40.2% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
QQQ: $220B ✓
VOO: $380B ✓
Sharpe Ratio
QQQ: 0.88
VOO: 0.82
📉 Volatility
QQQ: 22.5%
VOO: 18.2%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
QQQ: 47.5% unique
VOO: 4.0% unique

Bottom line: VOO wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VOO for your portfolio, but QQQ is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Shared Holdings (89 of 102 analyzed)

QQQ & VOO Intersection

Showing top 10 of 89 analyzed. Data for educational analysis only.

SymbolNameQQQVOOMin
NVDANVDA9.28%8.47%8.47%
AAPLAAPL8.94%6.88%6.88%
MSFTMSFT7.66%6.60%6.60%
AMZNAMZN5.26%4.06%4.06%
AVGOAVGO6.25%2.98%2.98%
GOOGLGOOGL3.87%2.80%2.80%
METAMETA2.95%2.41%2.41%
GOOGGOOG3.61%2.26%2.26%
TSLATSLA3.29%2.20%2.20%
NFLXNFLX2.41%0.82%0.82%

Min Weight: The minimum weight between the two ETFs for each shared holding. This represents the true overlap contribution.

Data sourced from official fund providers. Showing top holdings for educational analysis.

Top Holdings Only in QQQ

Unique to QQQ

SymbolNameWeight
SHOPSHOP0.99%
MELIMELI0.56%
ASMLASML0.49%
MRVLMRVL0.41%
PDDPDD0.41%

Top Holdings Only in VOO

Unique to VOO

SymbolNameWeight
BRK-BBRK-B1.50%
JPMJPM1.42%
LLYLLY1.18%
VV0.98%
XOMXOM0.84%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs