QQQ vs VEA: Complete Comparison

Invesco QQQ Trust vs Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.80%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
2 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

QQQ
VEA
0.8%
QQQ Only
Overlap
VEA Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

QQQ Return
+19.95%
VEA Return
+10.59%
Winner
QQQ
+9.37%
Max Drawdown
QQQ: -11.7%
VEA: -11.6%
QQQ Volatility (annualized)18.43%
VEA Volatility (annualized)21.50%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
QQQ
VEA
1 Year Return
+28.2%โœ“
+14.2%
3 Year Return
+12.5%โœ“
+5.5%
5 Year Return
+20.1%โœ“
+8.8%
Volatility
22.50%
18.80%โœ“
Expense Ratio
0.20%
0.05%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
QQQ
VEA
Volatility
22.50%
18.80%โœ“
Sharpe Ratio
0.88โœ“
0.42
Sortino Ratio
1.22โœ“
0.58
Max Drawdown
-35.20%โœ“
-41.20%
Beta
1.18
0.82

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

5 - 12

๐Ÿ† VEA wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
QQQ:0.20%โœ“
vs
VEA:0.05%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
QQQ:101 holdingsโœ“
vs
VEA:3,929 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
QQQ:+20.1%โœ“
vs
VEA:+8.8%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
QQQ: 49.6% in top 10
VEA: 15.6% in top 10โœ“
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
QQQ: $220B โœ“
VEA: $120B โœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
QQQ: 0.88โœ“
VEA: 0.42
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
QQQ: 22.5%
VEA: 18.8%โœ“
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
QQQ: 48.3% unique
VEA: 100.0% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: VEA wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VEA for your portfolio, but QQQ is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

2 shared holdings representing 0.8% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockQQQ WeightVEA WeightOverlap
1
ASML
ASML
0.51%2.05%0.51%
2
AZN
AZN
0.29%1.35%0.29%

Overlap by Sector

Other
2 stocks ยท 0.80% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

2
Shared Stocks
0.8%
Total Overlap
1
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in QQQ

Unique to QQQ

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA8.99%
AAPLAAPL7.94%
MSFTMSFT7.12%
AMZNAMZN4.87%
TSLATSLA4.21%

Top Holdings Only in VEA

Unique to VEA

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NESNNestle SA2.25%
NVONovo Nordisk A/S1.85%
TMToyota Motor Corp1.65%
SAPSAP SE1.55%
SHELShell PLC1.45%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on QQQ or VEA?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs