DGRO vs XLV: Complete Comparison
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF vs Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund โ overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
๐Performance Comparison
โ ๏ธRisk Metrics
Interpretation:
- ๐ Lower volatility = smoother ride
- โก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- โ ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- ๐ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
๐ DGRO wins this comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: DGRO wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings and 5-year return. Consider DGRO for your portfolio, but XLV is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
25 shared holdings representing 17.8% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | DGRO Weight | XLV Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JNJ JNJ | 3.22% | 8.84% | 3.22% |
| 2 | ABBV ABBV | 2.80% | 7.23% | 2.80% |
| 3 | MRK MRK | 2.11% | 4.44% | 2.11% |
| 4 | UNH UNH | 1.84% | 5.38% | 1.84% |
| 5 | LLY LLY | 1.47% | 14.33% | 1.47% |
| 6 | AMGN AMGN | 1.33% | 3.10% | 1.33% |
| 7 | GILD GILD | 0.93% | 2.72% | 0.93% |
| 8 | MDT MDT | 0.90% | 2.34% | 0.90% |
| 9 | ABT ABT | 0.86% | 3.87% | 0.86% |
| 10 | ELV ELV | 0.38% | 1.36% | 0.38% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in DGRO
Unique to DGRO
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL | AAPL | 3.33% |
| JPM | JPM | 3.07% |
| XOM | XOM | 3.02% |
| AVGO | AVGO | 2.87% |
| MSFT | MSFT | 2.85% |
Top Holdings Only in XLV
Unique to XLV
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| ISRG | ISRG | 3.67% |
| PFE | PFE | 2.64% |
| BSX | BSX | 2.52% |
| VRTX | VRTX | 2.06% |
| BMY | BMY | 1.89% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.