DGRO vs XLF: Complete Comparison
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF vs Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund โ overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
๐Performance Comparison
โ ๏ธRisk Metrics
Interpretation:
- ๐ Lower volatility = smoother ride
- โก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- โ ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- ๐ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
๐ DGRO wins this comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: DGRO wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider DGRO for your portfolio, but XLF is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
47 shared holdings representing 18.3% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | DGRO Weight | XLF Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JPM JPM | 3.07% | 10.82% | 3.07% |
| 2 | BAC BAC | 1.75% | 4.78% | 1.75% |
| 3 | MS MS | 1.33% | 2.84% | 1.33% |
| 4 | GS GS | 1.30% | 3.47% | 1.30% |
| 5 | C C | 1.14% | 2.64% | 1.14% |
| 6 | V V | 0.87% | 7.26% | 0.87% |
| 7 | USB USB | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.75% |
| 8 | BLK BLK | 0.63% | 2.02% | 0.63% |
| 9 | PNC PNC | 0.59% | 1.04% | 0.59% |
| 10 | MA MA | 0.52% | 5.81% | 0.52% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in DGRO
Unique to DGRO
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL | AAPL | 3.33% |
| JNJ | JNJ | 3.22% |
| XOM | XOM | 3.02% |
| AVGO | AVGO | 2.87% |
| MSFT | MSFT | 2.85% |
Top Holdings Only in XLF
Unique to XLF
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| BRK-B | BRK-B | 11.80% |
| WFC | WFC | 3.73% |
| SCHW | SCHW | 2.10% |
| COF | COF | 1.93% |
| PGR | PGR | 1.74% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.