DGRO vs VTI: Complete Comparison

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
9.29%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
3 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

DGRO
VTI
9.3%
DGRO Only
Overlap
VTI Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

DGRO Return
+7.13%
VTI Return
+8.62%
Winner
VTI
+1.49%
Max Drawdown
DGRO: -2.9%
VTI: -5.3%
DGRO Volatility (annualized)9.14%
VTI Volatility (annualized)11.82%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
DGRO
VTI
1 Year Return
+22.5%
+25.8%โœ“
3 Year Return
+9.5%
+9.8%
5 Year Return
+13.8%
+15.2%โœ“
Volatility
17.80%โœ“
19.10%
Expense Ratio
0.08%
0.03%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
DGRO
VTI
Volatility
17.80%โœ“
19.10%
Sharpe Ratio
0.72
0.75
Sortino Ratio
0.98
1.08โœ“
Max Drawdown
-34.20%โœ“
-34.50%
Beta
0.92
1.02

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

0 - 11

๐Ÿ† VTI wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
DGRO:0.08%โœ“
vs
VTI:0.03%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
DGRO:420 holdingsโœ“
vs
VTI:3,658 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
DGRO:+13.8%
vs
VTI:+15.2%
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
DGRO: 27.1% in top 10
VTI: 27.8% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
DGRO: $28B
VTI: $320B โœ“โœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
DGRO: 0.72
VTI: 0.75
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
DGRO: 17.8%
VTI: 19.1%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
DGRO: 56.9% unique
VTI: 63.6% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: VTI wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VTI for your portfolio, but DGRO is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

3 shared holdings representing 9.3% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockDGRO WeightVTI WeightOverlap
1
AAPL
AAPL
3.33%5.80%3.33%
2
MSFT
MSFT
2.85%5.45%2.85%
3
JPM
JPM
3.07%1.19%1.19%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
2 stocks ยท 6.18% overlap
Financials
1 stocks ยท 1.19% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

3
Shared Stocks
9.3%
Total Overlap
2
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in DGRO

Unique to DGRO

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
JNJJNJ3.22%
XOMXOM3.02%
AVGOAVGO2.87%
ABBVABBV2.80%
MRKMRK2.11%

Top Holdings Only in VTI

Unique to VTI

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVIDIA Corp4.25%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc3.00%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.02%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc Class A1.77%
GOOGAlphabet Inc Class C1.52%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs