VGT vs XLV: Complete Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF vs Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund — overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

VGT
XLV
0.0%
VGT Only
Overlap
XLV Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

VGT Return
+18.45%
XLV Return
-8.75%
Winner
VGT
+27.20%
Max Drawdown
VGT: -13.6%
XLV: -10.5%
VGT Volatility (annualized)24.23%
XLV Volatility (annualized)14.75%

📈 Comparison

Metric
VGT
XLV
1 Year Return
+34.8%
+12.5%
3 Year Return
+15.2%
+6.8%
5 Year Return
+24.8%
+11.2%
Volatility
23.80%
15.80%
Expense Ratio
0.10%
0.10%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚠️Risk Metrics

Metric
VGT
XLV
Volatility
23.80%
15.80%
Sharpe Ratio
1.02
0.68
Sortino Ratio
1.38
0.95
Max Drawdown
-38.20%
-25.20%
Beta
1.18
0.72

Interpretation:

  • 📊 Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • ⚡ Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • ⚠️ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • 📈 Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

⚔️ Comparison

10 - 7

🏆 VGT wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
VGT:0.10%
vs
XLV:0.10%
🎯 Number of Holdings
VGT:329 holdings
vs
XLV:64 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
VGT:+24.8%
vs
XLV:+11.2%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
VGT: 76.5% in top 10
XLV: 57.5% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
VGT: $70B ✓
XLV: $35B
Sharpe Ratio
VGT: 1.02
XLV: 0.68
📉 Volatility
VGT: 23.8%
XLV: 15.8%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
VGT: 73.9% unique
XLV: 90.5% unique

Bottom line: VGT wins with better number of holdings and 5-year return. Both have the same expense ratio, so cost isn't a differentiator. Consider VGT for your portfolio, but XLV is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockVGT WeightXLV WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in VGT

Unique to VGT

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
AAPLApple Inc20.85%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp19.65%
NVDANVIDIA Corp15.45%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.75%
CRMSalesforce Inc3.15%

Top Holdings Only in XLV

Unique to XLV

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
LLYLLY14.33%
JNJJNJ8.84%
ABBVABBV7.23%
UNHUNH5.38%
MRKMRK4.44%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on VGT or XLV?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs