VGT vs FTEC: Complete Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF vs Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
95.56%
Very High Overlap
Shared Holdings
10 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

VGT
FTEC
95.6%
VGT Only
Overlap
FTEC Only

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
VGT
FTEC
1 Year Return
+34.8%
N/A
3 Year Return
+15.2%
N/A
5 Year Return
+24.8%
N/A
Volatility
23.80%
undefined%
Expense Ratio
0.10%โœ“
0.50%
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš”๏ธ Comparison

10 - 2

๐Ÿ† VGT wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
VGT:0.10%โœ“
vs
FTEC:0.50%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
VGT:329 holdingsโœ“
vs
FTEC:10 holdingsโœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (3)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
VGT: 76.5% in top 10
FTEC: 62.5% in top 10โœ“
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
VGT: $70B โœ“โœ“
FTEC: $5B
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
VGT: 73.9% unique
FTEC: 73.9% unique

Bottom line: VGT wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VGT for your portfolio, but FTEC is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

10 shared holdings representing 95.6% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockVGT WeightFTEC WeightOverlap
1
AAPL
Apple Inc
20.85%16.52%16.52%
2
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
19.65%14.18%14.18%
3
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp
15.45%13.85%13.85%
4
AVGO
Broadcom Inc
4.75%5.12%4.75%
5
CRM
Salesforce Inc
3.15%2.42%2.42%
6
ORCL
Oracle Corp
2.75%2.35%2.35%
7
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
2.85%2.18%2.18%
8
ADBE
Adobe Inc
2.55%2.02%2.02%
9
ACN
Accenture PLC
2.15%1.95%1.95%
10
CSCO
Cisco Systems
2.35%1.88%1.88%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
9 stocks ยท 60.15% overlap
Other
1 stocks ยท 1.95% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

10
Shared Stocks
95.6%
Total Overlap
2
Sectors Represented

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs