FTEC vs XLK: Complete Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF vs Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
58.29%
Moderate Overlap
Shared Holdings
10 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

FTEC
XLK
58.3%
FTEC Only
Overlap
XLK Only

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
FTEC
XLK
1 Year Return
N/A
+35.2%
3 Year Return
N/A
+15.8%
5 Year Return
N/A
+25.5%
Volatility
undefined%
24.20%
Expense Ratio
0.50%
0.10%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš”๏ธ Comparison

2 - 10

๐Ÿ† XLK wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
FTEC:0.50%โœ“
vs
XLK:0.10%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
FTEC:10 holdingsโœ“
vs
XLK:65 holdingsโœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (3)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
FTEC: 62.5% in top 10
XLK: 62.3% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
FTEC: $5B
XLK: $55B โœ“โœ“
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
FTEC: 73.9% uniqueโœ“
XLK: 65.5% unique

Bottom line: XLK wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider XLK for your portfolio, but FTEC is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

10 shared holdings representing 58.3% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockFTEC WeightXLK WeightOverlap
1
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp
13.85%14.84%13.85%
2
AAPL
Apple Inc
16.52%13.10%13.10%
3
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
14.18%11.75%11.75%
4
AVGO
Broadcom Inc
5.12%5.36%5.12%
5
ORCL
Oracle Corp
2.35%2.81%2.35%
6
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
2.18%2.96%2.18%
7
CRM
Salesforce Inc
2.42%2.13%2.13%
8
CSCO
Cisco Systems Inc
1.88%2.60%1.88%
9
ACN
Accenture plc
1.95%1.42%1.42%
10
ADBE
Adobe Inc
2.02%1.25%1.25%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
9 stocks ยท 53.61% overlap
Other
1 stocks ยท 1.42% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

10
Shared Stocks
58.3%
Total Overlap
2
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in XLK

Unique to XLK

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
PLTRPLTR3.75%
MUMU2.72%
IBMIBM2.41%
LRCXLRCX1.88%
AMATAMAT1.76%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs