SCHZ vs AGG: Complete Comparison
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF vs iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF โ overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
๐Performance Comparison
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
๐ AGG wins this comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (3)
Bottom line: AGG wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider AGG for your portfolio, but SCHZ is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
4 shared holdings representing 48.4% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | SCHZ Weight | AGG Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UST-10Y U.S. Treasury Note 10Y | 8.50% | 3.85% | 3.85% |
| 2 | UST-5Y U.S. Treasury Note 5Y | 7.20% | 3.25% | 3.25% |
| 3 | UST-2Y U.S. Treasury Note 2Y | 5.40% | 2.85% | 2.85% |
| 4 | UST-7Y U.S. Treasury Note 7Y | 2.80% | 2.05% | 2.05% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in SCHZ
Unique to SCHZ
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| UST-30Y | U.S. Treasury Bond 30Y | 5.80% |
| FNMA-MBS | FNMA Mortgage-Backed | 4.85% |
| FHLMC-MBS | FHLMC Mortgage-Backed | 3.92% |
| GNMA-MBS | GNMA Mortgage-Backed | 3.15% |
| AAA-CORP | AAA-Rated Corporate Bonds | 2.45% |
Top Holdings Only in AGG
Unique to AGG
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| GNMA-30Y | GNMA 30Y MBS | 2.45% |
| FNMA-30Y | FNMA 30Y MBS | 2.25% |
| CORP-AAA | Corporate AAA Bonds | 1.85% |
| FHLMC-30Y | Freddie Mac 30Y MBS | 1.65% |
| UST-3Y | US Treasury 3Y | 1.55% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.
Want deeper analysis on SCHZ or AGG?
Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.
Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.