SCHZ vs XLK: Complete Comparison
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF vs Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund — overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis
Visual Overlap
📈Performance Comparison
⚔️Head-to-Head Comparison
🏆 XLK wins this comparison
Key Factors
▶Additional Metrics (3)
Bottom line: XLK wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider XLK for your portfolio, but SCHZ is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | SCHZ Weight | XLK Weight | Overlap |
|---|
Top Holdings Only in SCHZ
Unique to SCHZ
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| UST-10Y | U.S. Treasury Note 10Y | 8.50% |
| UST-5Y | U.S. Treasury Note 5Y | 7.20% |
| UST-30Y | U.S. Treasury Bond 30Y | 5.80% |
| UST-2Y | U.S. Treasury Note 2Y | 5.40% |
| FNMA-MBS | FNMA Mortgage-Backed | 4.85% |
Top Holdings Only in XLK
Unique to XLK
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVDA | 14.84% |
| AAPL | AAPL | 13.10% |
| MSFT | MSFT | 11.75% |
| AVGO | AVGO | 5.36% |
| PLTR | PLTR | 3.75% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.