QYLD vs XLF: Complete Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF vs Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.30%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
1 of 75
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

QYLD
XLF
0.3%
QYLD Only
Overlap
XLF Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

QYLD Return
+11.37%
XLF Return
+6.68%
Winner
QYLD
+4.69%
Max Drawdown
QYLD: -2.0%
XLF: -5.6%
QYLD Volatility (annualized)7.16%
XLF Volatility (annualized)13.17%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
QYLD
XLF
1 Year Return
+12.5%
+28.5%โœ“
3 Year Return
+5.5%
+10.5%โœ“
5 Year Return
+8.8%
+14.8%โœ“
Volatility
15.80%โœ“
21.50%
Expense Ratio
0.60%
0.10%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
QYLD
XLF
Volatility
15.80%โœ“
21.50%
Sharpe Ratio
0.52
0.65โœ“
Sortino Ratio
0.68
0.88โœ“
Max Drawdown
-28.50%โœ“
-55.20%
Beta
0.68
1.12

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

5 - 11

๐Ÿ† XLF wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
QYLD:0.60%โœ“
vs
XLF:0.10%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
QYLD:101 holdingsโœ“
vs
XLF:68 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
QYLD:+8.8%โœ“
vs
XLF:+14.8%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
QYLD: 57.4% in top 10
XLF: 55.7% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
QYLD: $8B
XLF: $40Bโœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
QYLD: 0.52
XLF: 0.65
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
QYLD: 15.8%โœ“
XLF: 21.5%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
QYLD: 48.2% unique
XLF: 86.3% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: XLF wins with better expense ratio and 5-year return. Consider XLF for your portfolio, but QYLD is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

1 shared holdings representing 0.3% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockQYLD WeightXLF WeightOverlap
1
PYPL
PYPL
0.32%0.76%0.32%

Overlap by Sector

Other
1 stocks ยท 0.32% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

1
Shared Stocks
0.3%
Total Overlap
1
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in QYLD

Unique to QYLD

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA10.11%
AAPLAAPL9.26%
MSFTMSFT8.23%
AVGOAVGO7.11%
AMZNAMZN5.47%

Top Holdings Only in XLF

Unique to XLF

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
BRK-BBRK-B11.80%
JPMJPM10.82%
VV7.26%
MAMA5.81%
BACBAC4.78%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs