QYLD vs VOO: Complete Comparison
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF โ overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
๐Performance Comparison
โ ๏ธRisk Metrics
Interpretation:
- ๐ Lower volatility = smoother ride
- โก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- โ ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- ๐ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
๐ VOO wins this comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: VOO wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings and 5-year return. Consider VOO for your portfolio, but QYLD is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
75 shared holdings representing 56.6% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | QYLD Weight | VOO Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA NVDA | 10.11% | 7.37% | 7.37% |
| 2 | AAPL AAPL | 9.26% | 7.07% | 7.07% |
| 3 | MSFT MSFT | 8.23% | 6.24% | 6.24% |
| 4 | AMZN AMZN | 5.47% | 3.86% | 3.86% |
| 5 | AVGO AVGO | 7.11% | 3.24% | 3.24% |
| 6 | GOOGL GOOGL | 4.15% | 3.18% | 3.18% |
| 7 | GOOG GOOG | 3.88% | 2.55% | 2.55% |
| 8 | META META | 3.21% | 2.40% | 2.40% |
| 9 | TSLA TSLA | 3.65% | 2.06% | 2.06% |
| 10 | NFLX NFLX | 2.28% | 0.78% | 0.78% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in QYLD
Unique to QYLD
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| PLTR | PLTR | 2.29% |
| AMD | AMD | 1.99% |
| CSCO | CSCO | 1.74% |
| MU | MU | 1.56% |
| AMAT | AMAT | 1.18% |
Top Holdings Only in VOO
Unique to VOO
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| BRK-B | BRK-B | 1.61% |
| LLY | LLY | 1.46% |
| JPM | JPM | 1.40% |
| V | V | 0.96% |
| JNJ | JNJ | 0.85% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.