IWM vs XLV Overlap Analysis
Comparing iShares Russell 2000 ETF and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund
Visual Overlap
⚔️Head-to-Head Comparison
🏆 IWM wins this comparison
Key Factors
▶Additional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: IWM wins with better number of holdings. Consider IWM for your portfolio, but XLV is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Shared Holdings (0 of 10 analyzed)
IWM & XLV Intersection
| Symbol | Name | IWM | XLV | Min |
|---|
Min Weight: The minimum weight between the two ETFs for each shared holding. This represents the true overlap contribution.
Data sourced from official fund providers. Showing top holdings for educational analysis.
Top Holdings Only in IWM
Unique to IWM
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| CRDO | CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING LTD | 0.86% |
| BE | BLOOM ENERGY CLASS A CORP | 0.80% |
| FN | FABRINET | 0.62% |
| IONQ | IONQ INC | 0.51% |
| NXT | NEXTPOWER INC CLASS A | 0.44% |
Top Holdings Only in XLV
Unique to XLV
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| LLY | Eli Lilly and Co | 0.12% |
| UNH | UnitedHealth Group | 0.10% |
| JNJ | Johnson & Johnson | 0.07% |
| ABBV | AbbVie Inc | 0.06% |
| MRK | Merck & Co | 0.05% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.