IWM vs XLF: Complete Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 ETF vs Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund — overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 75
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

IWM
XLF
0.0%
IWM Only
Overlap
XLF Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

IWM Return
+8.85%
XLF Return
-7.65%
Winner
IWM
+16.49%
Max Drawdown
IWM: -11.0%
XLF: -14.0%
IWM Volatility (annualized)20.28%
XLF Volatility (annualized)16.23%

📈 Comparison

Metric
IWM
XLF
1 Year Return
+18.5%
+28.5%
3 Year Return
+4.2%
+10.5%
5 Year Return
+10.5%
+14.8%
Volatility
24.80%
21.50%
Expense Ratio
0.19%
0.10%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚠️Risk Metrics

Metric
IWM
XLF
Volatility
24.80%
21.50%
Sharpe Ratio
0.38
0.65
Sortino Ratio
0.52
0.88
Max Drawdown
-41.50%
-55.20%
Beta
1.25
1.12

Interpretation:

  • 📊 Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • ⚡ Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • ⚠️ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • 📈 Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

⚔️ Comparison

9 - 10

🏆 XLF wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
IWM:0.19%
vs
XLF:0.10%
🎯 Number of Holdings
IWM:1,983 holdings
vs
XLF:68 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
IWM:+10.5%
vs
XLF:+14.8%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
IWM: 5.3% in top 10
XLF: 55.7% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
IWM: $60B ✓
XLF: $40B
Sharpe Ratio
IWM: 0.38
XLF: 0.65
📉 Volatility
IWM: 24.8%
XLF: 21.5%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
IWM: 100.0% unique
XLF: 86.3% unique

Bottom line: XLF wins with better expense ratio and 5-year return. Consider XLF for your portfolio, but IWM is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockIWM WeightXLF WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in IWM

Unique to IWM

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
CRDOCREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING LTD0.86%
BEBLOOM ENERGY CLASS A CORP0.80%
FNFABRINET0.62%
IONQIONQ INC0.51%
NXTNEXTPOWER INC CLASS A0.44%

Top Holdings Only in XLF

Unique to XLF

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
BRK-BBRK-B11.80%
JPMJPM10.82%
VV7.26%
MAMA5.81%
BACBAC4.78%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on IWM or XLF?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs