IWD vs VOO: Complete Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
41.14%
Moderate Overlap
Shared Holdings
363 of 462
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

IWD
VOO
41.1%
IWD Only
Overlap
VOO Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

IWD Return
+9.13%
VOO Return
+8.73%
Winner
IWD
+0.40%
Max Drawdown
IWD: -6.8%
VOO: -8.9%
IWD Volatility (annualized)12.27%
VOO Volatility (annualized)14.09%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
IWD
VOO
1 Year Return
+19.5%
+26.5%โœ“
3 Year Return
+7.2%
+10.2%โœ“
5 Year Return
+11.8%
+15.8%โœ“
Volatility
17.20%โœ“
18.20%
Expense Ratio
0.19%
0.03%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
IWD
VOO
Volatility
17.20%โœ“
18.20%
Sharpe Ratio
0.65
0.82โœ“
Sortino Ratio
0.92
1.15โœ“
Max Drawdown
-38.50%
-33.80%โœ“
Beta
0.88
1.00

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

7 - 9

๐Ÿ† VOO wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
IWD:0.19%โœ“
vs
VOO:0.03%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
IWD:820 holdingsโœ“
vs
VOO:503 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
IWD:+11.8%โœ“
vs
VOO:+15.8%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
IWD: 19.0% in top 10โœ“
VOO: 39.6% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
IWD: $60B โœ“
VOO: $380B โœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
IWD: 0.65
VOO: 0.82โœ“
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
IWD: 17.2%
VOO: 18.2%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
IWD: 58.1% uniqueโœ“
VOO: 18.4% unique

Bottom line: VOO wins with better expense ratio and 5-year return. Consider VOO for your portfolio, but IWD is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

363 shared holdings representing 41.1% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockIWD WeightVOO WeightOverlap
1
GOOGL
GOOGL
2.17%3.18%2.17%
2
AMZN
AMZN
2.01%3.86%2.01%
3
GOOG
GOOG
1.77%2.55%1.77%
4
BRK-B
BRK-B
3.07%1.61%1.61%
5
JPM
JPM
2.93%1.40%1.40%
6
META
META
0.87%2.40%0.87%
7
JNJ
JNJ
1.63%0.85%0.85%
8
XOM
XOM
1.68%0.84%0.84%
9
WMT
WMT
1.49%0.83%0.83%
10
TJX
TJX
0.29%0.29%0.29%

Overlap by Sector

Other
314 stocks ยท 17.55% overlap
Technology
6 stocks ยท 5.20% overlap
Consumer Discretionary
5 stocks ยท 2.67% overlap
Healthcare
7 stocks ยท 1.77% overlap
Financials
4 stocks ยท 1.76% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

363
Shared Stocks
41.1%
Total Overlap
5
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in IWD

Unique to IWD

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
BACBAC1.12%
PGPG1.09%
CSCOCSCO1.05%
UNHUNH0.99%
WFCWFC0.97%

Top Holdings Only in VOO

Unique to VOO

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA7.37%
AAPLAAPL7.07%
MSFTMSFT6.24%
AVGOAVGO3.24%
TSLATSLA2.06%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on IWD or VOO?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs