IWD vs DIA: Complete Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
3.90%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
5 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

IWD
DIA
3.9%
IWD Only
Overlap
DIA Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

IWD Return
+9.13%
DIA Return
+2.66%
Winner
IWD
+6.46%
Max Drawdown
IWD: -6.8%
DIA: -9.8%
IWD Volatility (annualized)12.27%
DIA Volatility (annualized)14.29%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
IWD
DIA
1 Year Return
+19.5%
+22.8%โœ“
3 Year Return
+7.2%
+8.5%โœ“
5 Year Return
+11.8%
+13.2%โœ“
Volatility
17.20%โœ“
17.50%
Expense Ratio
0.19%
0.16%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
IWD
DIA
Volatility
17.20%โœ“
17.50%
Sharpe Ratio
0.65
0.71โœ“
Sortino Ratio
0.92
1.02โœ“
Max Drawdown
-38.50%
-36.80%โœ“
Beta
0.88
0.92

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

7 - 5

๐Ÿ† IWD wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
IWD:0.19%โœ“
vs
DIA:0.16%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
IWD:820 holdingsโœ“
vs
DIA:30 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
IWD:+11.8%
vs
DIA:+13.2%
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
IWD: 19.0% in top 10โœ“
DIA: 65.1% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
IWD: $60B โœ“โœ“
DIA: $35B
โšก Sharpe Ratio
IWD: 0.65
DIA: 0.71
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
IWD: 17.2%
DIA: 17.5%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
IWD: 58.1% unique
DIA: 89.5% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: IWD wins with better number of holdings. Consider IWD for your portfolio, but DIA is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

5 shared holdings representing 3.9% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockIWD WeightDIA WeightOverlap
1
UNH
UNH
0.99%9.85%0.99%
2
GS
GS
0.83%8.25%0.83%
3
CAT
CAT
0.81%6.25%0.81%
4
HD
HD
0.28%6.65%0.28%
5
AMGN
AMGN
0.15%5.85%0.15%

Overlap by Sector

Healthcare
2 stocks ยท 1.14% overlap
Financials
1 stocks ยท 0.83% overlap
Industrials
1 stocks ยท 0.81% overlap
Consumer Discretionary
1 stocks ยท 0.28% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

5
Shared Stocks
3.9%
Total Overlap
4
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in IWD

Unique to IWD

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
BRK-BBRK-B3.07%
JPMJPM2.93%
GOOGLGOOGL2.17%
AMZNAMZN2.01%
GOOGGOOG1.77%

Top Holdings Only in DIA

Unique to DIA

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.85%
VVisa Inc5.65%
CRMSalesforce Inc5.45%
MCDMcDonald's Corp5.25%
BABoeing Co5.05%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on IWD or DIA?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs