IWB vs XLV: Complete Comparison
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund โ overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
๐Performance Comparison
โ ๏ธRisk Metrics
Interpretation:
- ๐ Lower volatility = smoother ride
- โก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- โ ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- ๐ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: IWB and XLV are very similar. Choose based on your broker's commission structure or personal preference.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
54 shared holdings representing 8.1% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | IWB Weight | XLV Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LLY LLY | 1.27% | 14.33% | 1.27% |
| 2 | JNJ JNJ | 0.77% | 8.84% | 0.77% |
| 3 | ABBV ABBV | 0.63% | 7.23% | 0.63% |
| 4 | AMGN AMGN | 0.27% | 3.10% | 0.27% |
| 5 | GILD GILD | 0.24% | 2.72% | 0.24% |
| 6 | DHR DHR | 0.23% | 2.61% | 0.23% |
| 7 | PFE PFE | 0.23% | 2.64% | 0.23% |
| 8 | BSX BSX | 0.22% | 2.52% | 0.22% |
| 9 | MDT MDT | 0.21% | 2.34% | 0.21% |
| 10 | SYK SYK | 0.19% | 2.21% | 0.19% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in IWB
Unique to IWB
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVDA | 6.89% |
| AAPL | AAPL | 6.43% |
| MSFT | MSFT | 5.78% |
| AMZN | AMZN | 3.45% |
| AVGO | AVGO | 2.94% |
Top Holdings Only in XLV
Unique to XLV
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| UNH | UNH | 5.38% |
| MRK | MRK | 4.44% |
| TMO | TMO | 3.90% |
| ABT | ABT | 3.87% |
| ISRG | ISRG | 3.67% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.