IWB vs DIA: Complete Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
8.53%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
4 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

IWB
DIA
8.5%
IWB Only
Overlap
DIA Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

IWB Return
+8.28%
DIA Return
+9.12%
Winner
DIA
+0.84%
Max Drawdown
IWB: -5.2%
DIA: -5.1%
IWB Volatility (annualized)11.54%
DIA Volatility (annualized)10.72%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
IWB
DIA
1 Year Return
+25.5%โœ“
+22.8%
3 Year Return
+9.8%โœ“
+8.5%
5 Year Return
+15.2%โœ“
+13.2%
Volatility
18.80%
17.50%โœ“
Expense Ratio
0.20%
0.16%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
IWB
DIA
Volatility
18.80%
17.50%โœ“
Sharpe Ratio
0.78โœ“
0.71
Sortino Ratio
1.05
1.02
Max Drawdown
-34.20%โœ“
-36.80%
Beta
1.01
0.92

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

5 - 8

๐Ÿ† DIA wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
IWB:0.20%โœ“
vs
DIA:0.16%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
IWB:1,003 holdingsโœ“
vs
DIA:30 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
IWB:+15.2%
vs
DIA:+13.2%
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
IWB: 36.5% in top 10โœ“
DIA: 65.1% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
IWB: $30B
DIA: $35Bโœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
IWB: 0.78
DIA: 0.71
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
IWB: 18.8%
DIA: 17.5%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
IWB: 19.7% unique
DIA: 89.5% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: DIA wins with better expense ratio. Consider DIA for your portfolio, but IWB is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

4 shared holdings representing 8.5% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockIWB WeightDIA WeightOverlap
1
MSFT
MSFT
5.78%6.85%5.78%
2
V
V
0.88%5.65%0.88%
3
AMGN
AMGN
0.27%5.85%0.27%
4
BA
BA
0.24%5.05%0.24%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
1 stocks ยท 5.78% overlap
Financials
1 stocks ยท 0.88% overlap
Healthcare
1 stocks ยท 0.27% overlap
Industrials
1 stocks ยท 0.24% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

4
Shared Stocks
8.5%
Total Overlap
4
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in IWB

Unique to IWB

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA6.89%
AAPLAAPL6.43%
AMZNAMZN3.45%
AVGOAVGO2.94%
GOOGLGOOGL2.89%

Top Holdings Only in DIA

Unique to DIA

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
UNHUnitedHealth Group9.85%
GSGoldman Sachs8.25%
HDHome Depot6.65%
CATCaterpillar Inc6.25%
CRMSalesforce Inc5.45%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs