HDV vs XLV: Complete Comparison

iShares Core High Dividend ETF vs Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
21.88%
Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
5 of 60
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

HDV
XLV
21.9%
HDV Only
Overlap
XLV Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

HDV Return
+2.06%
XLV Return
+14.93%
Winner
XLV
+12.87%
Max Drawdown
HDV: -3.7%
XLV: -5.6%
HDV Volatility (annualized)9.00%
XLV Volatility (annualized)13.94%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
HDV
XLV
1 Year Return
+15.8%โœ“
+12.5%
3 Year Return
+7.2%
+6.8%
5 Year Return
+10.5%
+11.2%โœ“
Volatility
16.50%
15.80%โœ“
Expense Ratio
0.08%โœ“
0.10%
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
HDV
XLV
Volatility
16.50%
15.80%โœ“
Sharpe Ratio
0.58
0.68โœ“
Sortino Ratio
0.78
0.95โœ“
Max Drawdown
-35.50%
-25.20%โœ“
Beta
0.82
0.72

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

6 - 5

๐Ÿ† HDV wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
HDV:0.08%โœ“
vs
XLV:0.10%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
HDV:75 holdingsโœ“
vs
XLV:64 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
HDV:+10.5%
vs
XLV:+11.2%
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
HDV: 53.2% in top 10
XLV: 57.5% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
HDV: $10B
XLV: $35Bโœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
HDV: 0.58
XLV: 0.68
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
HDV: 16.5%
XLV: 15.8%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
HDV: 89.3% unique
XLV: 90.5% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: HDV wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider HDV for your portfolio, but XLV is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

5 shared holdings representing 21.9% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockHDV WeightXLV WeightOverlap
1
JNJ
JNJ
7.09%8.84%7.09%
2
ABBV
ABBV
6.16%7.23%6.16%
3
MRK
MRK
4.64%4.44%4.44%
4
GILD
GILD
2.06%2.72%2.06%
5
MDT
MDT
1.98%2.34%1.98%

Overlap by Sector

Healthcare
4 stocks ยท 19.75% overlap
Other
1 stocks ยท 1.98% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

5
Shared Stocks
21.9%
Total Overlap
2
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in HDV

Unique to HDV

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
XOMXOM8.90%
CVXCVX6.26%
PGPG4.31%
KOKO4.15%
PEPPEP4.00%

Top Holdings Only in XLV

Unique to XLV

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
LLYLLY14.33%
UNHUNH5.38%
TMOTMO3.90%
ABTABT3.87%
ISRGISRG3.67%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs