HDV vs VOO: Complete Comparison
iShares Core High Dividend ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF โ overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
๐Performance Comparison
โ ๏ธRisk Metrics
Interpretation:
- ๐ Lower volatility = smoother ride
- โก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- โ ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- ๐ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
โ๏ธHead-to-Head Comparison
๐ VOO wins this comparison
Key Factors
โถAdditional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: VOO wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings and 5-year return. Consider VOO for your portfolio, but HDV is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
45 shared holdings representing 7.7% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | HDV Weight | VOO Weight | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JNJ JNJ | 7.09% | 0.85% | 0.85% |
| 2 | XOM XOM | 8.90% | 0.84% | 0.84% |
| 3 | ABBV ABBV | 6.16% | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| 4 | GILD GILD | 2.06% | 0.27% | 0.27% |
| 5 | TXN TXN | 2.41% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
| 6 | MDT MDT | 1.98% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
| 7 | UNP UNP | 1.77% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
| 8 | COP COP | 1.98% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
| 9 | BX BX | 1.33% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
| 10 | MO MO | 3.03% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
Overlap by Sector
Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution
Top Holdings Only in HDV
Unique to HDV
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| CVX | CVX | 6.26% |
| MRK | MRK | 4.64% |
| PG | PG | 4.31% |
| KO | KO | 4.15% |
| PEP | PEP | 4.00% |
Top Holdings Only in VOO
Unique to VOO
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVDA | 7.37% |
| AAPL | AAPL | 7.07% |
| MSFT | MSFT | 6.24% |
| AMZN | AMZN | 3.86% |
| AVGO | AVGO | 3.24% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
๐ This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.