FTEC vs IWM: Complete Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF — overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

FTEC
IWM
0.0%
FTEC Only
Overlap
IWM Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

FTEC Return
+18.57%
IWM Return
+8.85%
Winner
FTEC
+9.72%
Max Drawdown
FTEC: -13.7%
IWM: -11.0%
FTEC Volatility (annualized)24.30%
IWM Volatility (annualized)20.28%

📈 Comparison

Metric
FTEC
IWM
1 Year Return
N/A
+18.5%
3 Year Return
N/A
+4.2%
5 Year Return
N/A
+10.5%
Volatility
undefined%
24.80%
Expense Ratio
0.50%
0.19%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚔️ Comparison

0 - 14

🏆 IWM wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
FTEC:0.50%
vs
IWM:0.19%
🎯 Number of Holdings
FTEC:10 holdings
vs
IWM:1,983 holdings
Additional Metrics (3)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
FTEC: 62.5% in top 10
IWM: 5.3% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
FTEC: $5B
IWM: $60B ✓
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
FTEC: 73.9% unique
IWM: 100.0% unique

Bottom line: IWM wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider IWM for your portfolio, but FTEC is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockFTEC WeightIWM WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in FTEC

Unique to FTEC

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
AAPLApple Inc16.52%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp14.18%
NVDANVIDIA Corp13.85%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.12%
CRMSalesforce Inc2.42%

Top Holdings Only in IWM

Unique to IWM

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
CRDOCREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING LTD0.86%
BEBLOOM ENERGY CLASS A CORP0.80%
FNFABRINET0.62%
IONQIONQ INC0.51%
NXTNEXTPOWER INC CLASS A0.44%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on FTEC or IWM?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs