AGG vs VOO: Complete Comparison

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF — overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

AGG
VOO
0.0%
AGG Only
Overlap
VOO Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

AGG Return
-0.81%
VOO Return
+7.48%
Winner
VOO
+8.29%
Max Drawdown
AGG: -2.5%
VOO: -8.9%
AGG Volatility (annualized)4.14%
VOO Volatility (annualized)13.99%

📈 Comparison

Metric
AGG
VOO
1 Year Return
+2.5%
+26.5%
3 Year Return
-2.8%
+10.2%
5 Year Return
+0.2%
+15.8%
Volatility
6.50%
18.20%
Expense Ratio
0.03%
0.03%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚠️Risk Metrics

Metric
AGG
VOO
Volatility
6.50%
18.20%
Sharpe Ratio
-0.15
0.82
Sortino Ratio
-0.18
1.15
Max Drawdown
-18.50%
-33.80%
Beta
0.02
1.00

Interpretation:

  • 📊 Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • ⚡ Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • ⚠️ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • 📈 Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

⚔️ Comparison

10 - 5

🏆 AGG wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
AGG:0.03%
vs
VOO:0.03%
🎯 Number of Holdings
AGG:11,234 holdings
vs
VOO:503 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
AGG:+0.2%
vs
VOO:+15.8%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
AGG: 23.2% in top 10
VOO: 39.6% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
AGG: $95B ✓
VOO: $380B ✓
Sharpe Ratio
AGG: -0.15
VOO: 0.82
📉 Volatility
AGG: 6.5%
VOO: 18.2%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
AGG: 100.0% unique
VOO: 18.4% unique

Bottom line: AGG wins with better number of holdings. Both have the same expense ratio, so cost isn't a differentiator. Consider AGG for your portfolio, but VOO is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockAGG WeightVOO WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in AGG

Unique to AGG

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
UST-10YUS Treasury 10Y3.85%
UST-5YUS Treasury 5Y3.25%
UST-2YUS Treasury 2Y2.85%
GNMA-30YGNMA 30Y MBS2.45%
FNMA-30YFNMA 30Y MBS2.25%

Top Holdings Only in VOO

Unique to VOO

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA7.37%
AAPLAAPL7.07%
MSFTMSFT6.24%
AMZNAMZN3.86%
AVGOAVGO3.24%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on AGG or VOO?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs