AGG vs VTI Overlap Analysis

Comparing iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

AGG
VTI
0.0%
AGG Only
Overlap
VTI Only

⚔️Head-to-Head Comparison

8 - 5

🏆 AGG wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
AGG:0.03%
vs
VTI:0.03%
🎯 Number of Holdings
AGG:11,234 holdings
vs
VTI:3,658 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
AGG:+0.2%
vs
VTI:+15.2%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
AGG: 0.2% in top 10
VTI: 0.3% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
AGG: $95B ✓
VTI: $320B ✓
Sharpe Ratio
AGG: -0.15
VTI: 0.75
📉 Volatility
AGG: 6.5%
VTI: 19.1%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
AGG: 100.0% unique
VTI: 63.4% unique

Bottom line: AGG wins with better number of holdings. Both have the same expense ratio, so cost isn't a differentiator. Consider AGG for your portfolio, but VTI is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Shared Holdings (0 of 10 analyzed)

AGG & VTI Intersection

SymbolNameAGGVTIMin

Min Weight: The minimum weight between the two ETFs for each shared holding. This represents the true overlap contribution.

Data sourced from official fund providers. Showing top holdings for educational analysis.

Top Holdings Only in AGG

Unique to AGG

SymbolNameWeight
UST-10YUS Treasury 10Y0.04%
UST-5YUS Treasury 5Y0.03%
UST-2YUS Treasury 2Y0.03%
GNMA-30YGNMA 30Y MBS0.02%
FNMA-30YFNMA 30Y MBS0.02%

Top Holdings Only in VTI

Unique to VTI

SymbolNameWeight
AAPLApple Inc0.06%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp0.05%
NVDANVIDIA Corp0.04%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc0.03%
METAMeta Platforms Inc0.02%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs