AGG vs VTI Overlap

Comparing iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

AGG
VTI
0.0%
AGG Only
Overlap
VTI Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

AGG Return
+2.68%
VTI Return
+8.62%
Winner
VTI
+5.94%
Max Drawdown
AGG: -1.1%
VTI: -5.3%
AGG Volatility (annualized)3.24%
VTI Volatility (annualized)11.82%

📈 Comparison

Metric
AGG
VTI
1 Year Return
+2.5%
+25.8%
3 Year Return
-2.8%
+9.8%
5 Year Return
+0.2%
+15.2%
Volatility
6.50%
19.10%
Expense Ratio
0.03%
0.03%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚠️Risk Metrics

Metric
AGG
VTI
Volatility
6.50%
19.10%
Sharpe Ratio
-0.15
0.75
Sortino Ratio
-0.18
1.08
Max Drawdown
-18.50%
-34.50%
Beta
0.02
1.02

Interpretation:

  • 📊 Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • ⚡ Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • ⚠️ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • 📈 Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

⚔️ Comparison

8 - 5

🏆 AGG wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
AGG:0.03%
vs
VTI:0.03%
🎯 Number of Holdings
AGG:11,234 holdings
vs
VTI:3,658 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
AGG:+0.2%
vs
VTI:+15.2%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
AGG: 23.2% in top 10
VTI: 27.8% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
AGG: $95B ✓
VTI: $320B ✓
Sharpe Ratio
AGG: -0.15
VTI: 0.75
📉 Volatility
AGG: 6.5%
VTI: 19.1%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
AGG: 100.0% unique
VTI: 63.6% unique

Bottom line: AGG wins with better number of holdings. Both have the same expense ratio, so cost isn't a differentiator. Consider AGG for your portfolio, but VTI is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockAGG WeightVTI WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in AGG

Unique to AGG

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
UST-10YUS Treasury 10Y3.85%
UST-5YUS Treasury 5Y3.25%
UST-2YUS Treasury 2Y2.85%
GNMA-30YGNMA 30Y MBS2.45%
FNMA-30YFNMA 30Y MBS2.25%

Top Holdings Only in VTI

Unique to VTI

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
AAPLApple Inc5.80%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.45%
NVDANVIDIA Corp4.25%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc3.00%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.02%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Compare More ETFs