XLV vs XLE: Complete Comparison

Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund vs Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund — overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 22
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

XLV
XLE
0.0%
XLV Only
Overlap
XLE Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

XLV Return
-8.75%
XLE Return
+32.56%
Winner
XLE
+41.31%
Max Drawdown
XLV: -10.5%
XLE: -12.1%
XLV Volatility (annualized)14.75%
XLE Volatility (annualized)23.10%

📈 Comparison

Metric
XLV
XLE
1 Year Return
+12.5%
+8.2%
3 Year Return
+6.8%
+18.5%
5 Year Return
+11.2%
+12.8%
Volatility
15.80%
28.50%
Expense Ratio
0.10%
0.10%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚠️Risk Metrics

Metric
XLV
XLE
Volatility
15.80%
28.50%
Sharpe Ratio
0.68
0.42
Sortino Ratio
0.95
0.58
Max Drawdown
-25.20%
-62.50%
Beta
0.72
1.35

Interpretation:

  • 📊 Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • ⚡ Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • ⚠️ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • 📈 Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

⚔️ Comparison

11 - 3

🏆 XLV wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
XLV:0.10%
vs
XLE:0.10%
🎯 Number of Holdings
XLV:64 holdings
vs
XLE:21 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
XLV:+11.2%
vs
XLE:+12.8%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
XLV: 57.5% in top 10
XLE: 74.8% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
XLV: $35B
XLE: $32B
Sharpe Ratio
XLV: 0.68
XLE: 0.42
📉 Volatility
XLV: 15.8%
XLE: 28.5%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
XLV: 90.5% unique
XLE: 97.2% unique

Bottom line: XLV wins with better number of holdings. Both have the same expense ratio, so cost isn't a differentiator. Consider XLV for your portfolio, but XLE is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockXLV WeightXLE WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in XLV

Unique to XLV

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
LLYLLY14.33%
JNJJNJ8.84%
ABBVABBV7.23%
UNHUNH5.38%
MRKMRK4.44%

Top Holdings Only in XLE

Unique to XLE

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
XOMXOM23.35%
CVXCVX16.91%
COPCOP6.90%
WMBWMB4.55%
MPCMPC3.98%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on XLV or XLE?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs