XLF vs XLV: Complete Comparison

Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund vs Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund — overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 60
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

XLF
XLV
0.0%
XLF Only
Overlap
XLV Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

XLF Return
-7.65%
XLV Return
-8.75%
Winner
XLF
+1.10%
Max Drawdown
XLF: -14.0%
XLV: -10.5%
XLF Volatility (annualized)16.23%
XLV Volatility (annualized)14.75%

📈 Comparison

Metric
XLF
XLV
1 Year Return
+28.5%
+12.5%
3 Year Return
+10.5%
+6.8%
5 Year Return
+14.8%
+11.2%
Volatility
21.50%
15.80%
Expense Ratio
0.10%
0.10%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚠️Risk Metrics

Metric
XLF
XLV
Volatility
21.50%
15.80%
Sharpe Ratio
0.65
0.68
Sortino Ratio
0.88
0.95
Max Drawdown
-55.20%
-25.20%
Beta
1.12
0.72

Interpretation:

  • 📊 Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • ⚡ Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • ⚠️ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • 📈 Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

⚔️ Comparison

9 - 4

🏆 XLF wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
XLF:0.10%
vs
XLV:0.10%
🎯 Number of Holdings
XLF:68 holdings
vs
XLV:64 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
XLF:+14.8%
vs
XLV:+11.2%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
XLF: 55.7% in top 10
XLV: 57.5% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
XLF: $40B
XLV: $35B
Sharpe Ratio
XLF: 0.65
XLV: 0.68
📉 Volatility
XLF: 21.5%
XLV: 15.8%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
XLF: 86.3% unique
XLV: 90.5% unique

Bottom line: XLF wins with better number of holdings and 5-year return. Both have the same expense ratio, so cost isn't a differentiator. Consider XLF for your portfolio, but XLV is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockXLF WeightXLV WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in XLF

Unique to XLF

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
BRK-BBRK-B11.80%
JPMJPM10.82%
VV7.26%
MAMA5.81%
BACBAC4.78%

Top Holdings Only in XLV

Unique to XLV

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
LLYLLY14.33%
JNJJNJ8.84%
ABBVABBV7.23%
UNHUNH5.38%
MRKMRK4.44%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on XLF or XLV?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs