XLE vs ICLN: Complete Comparison

Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 17
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

XLE
ICLN
0.0%
XLE Only
Overlap
ICLN Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

XLE Return
+6.10%
ICLN Return
+16.60%
Winner
ICLN
+10.50%
Max Drawdown
XLE: -7.4%
ICLN: -11.2%
XLE Volatility (annualized)17.69%
ICLN Volatility (annualized)25.31%

📈 Comparison

Metric
XLE
ICLN
1 Year Return
+8.2%
-5.5%
3 Year Return
+18.5%
-12.5%
5 Year Return
+12.8%
+8.5%
Volatility
28.50%
32.50%
Expense Ratio
0.10%
0.41%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚠️Risk Metrics

Metric
XLE
ICLN
Volatility
28.50%
32.50%
Sharpe Ratio
0.42
-0.28
Sortino Ratio
0.58
-0.42
Max Drawdown
-62.50%
-65.50%
Beta
1.35
1.15

Interpretation:

  • 📊 Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • ⚡ Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • ⚠️ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • 📈 Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

⚔️ Comparison

13 - 7

🏆 XLE wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
XLE:0.10%
vs
ICLN:0.41%
🎯 Number of Holdings
XLE:21 holdings
vs
ICLN:75 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
XLE:+12.8%
vs
ICLN:+8.5%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
XLE: 74.8% in top 10
ICLN: 36.4% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
XLE: $32B
ICLN: $4B
Sharpe Ratio
XLE: 0.42
ICLN: -0.28
📉 Volatility
XLE: 28.5%
ICLN: 32.5%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
XLE: 97.2% unique
ICLN: 99.9% unique

Bottom line: XLE wins with better expense ratio and 5-year return. Consider XLE for your portfolio, but ICLN is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockXLE WeightICLN WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in XLE

Unique to XLE

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
XOMXOM23.35%
CVXCVX16.91%
COPCOP6.90%
WMBWMB4.55%
MPCMPC3.98%

Top Holdings Only in ICLN

Unique to ICLN

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
BEBE11.15%
FSLRFSLR8.35%
NXTNXT6.62%
ORAORA2.95%
ENPHENPH1.69%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on XLE or ICLN?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs