VXUS vs XLK Overlap AnalysisOverlap
Comparing Vanguard Total International Stock ETF and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
Visual Overlap
Price Performance
Historical price comparison over 3M
📈Performance Comparison
⚠️Risk Metrics
Interpretation:
- 📊 Lower volatility = smoother ride
- ⚡ Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
- ⚠️ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
- 📈 Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500
⚔️Head-to-Head Comparison
🏆 VXUS wins this comparison
Key Factors
▶Additional Metrics (5)
Bottom line: VXUS wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VXUS for your portfolio, but XLK is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.
Detailed Overlap Analysis
0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap
Top Shared Holdings
| # | Stock | VXUS Weight | XLK Weight | Overlap |
|---|
Top Holdings Only in VXUS
Unique to VXUS
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| RY | RY | 0.54% |
| SHOP | SHOP | 0.41% |
| ENB | ENB | 0.30% |
| TD | TD | 0.30% |
| BN | BN | 0.27% |
Top Holdings Only in XLK
Unique to XLK
| Symbol | Name | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVDA | 14.84% |
| AAPL | AAPL | 13.10% |
| MSFT | MSFT | 11.75% |
| AVGO | AVGO | 5.36% |
| PLTR | PLTR | 3.75% |
Price Correlation
How We Calculate Overlap
We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:
Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holdingNormalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).
Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.
📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.