VWO vs XLF: Complete Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF vs Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund — overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
0.00%
Very Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
0 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

VWO
XLF
0.0%
VWO Only
Overlap
XLF Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

VWO Return
+5.17%
XLF Return
-3.58%
Winner
VWO
+8.75%
Max Drawdown
VWO: -11.2%
XLF: -11.7%
VWO Volatility (annualized)20.64%
XLF Volatility (annualized)16.26%

📈 Comparison

Metric
VWO
XLF
1 Year Return
+15.5%
+28.5%
3 Year Return
+1.8%
+10.5%
5 Year Return
+6.2%
+14.8%
Volatility
21.50%
21.50%
Expense Ratio
0.08%
0.10%
⚠️ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

⚠️Risk Metrics

Metric
VWO
XLF
Volatility
21.50%
21.50%
Sharpe Ratio
0.22
0.65
Sortino Ratio
0.32
0.88
Max Drawdown
-48.50%
-55.20%
Beta
0.88
1.12

Interpretation:

  • 📊 Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • ⚡ Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • ⚠️ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • 📈 Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

⚔️ Comparison

12 - 5

🏆 VWO wins this comparison

Key Factors

💰 Expense Ratio
VWO:0.08%
vs
XLF:0.10%
🎯 Number of Holdings
VWO:5,219 holdings
vs
XLF:68 holdings
📈 5-Year Return
VWO:+6.2%
vs
XLF:+14.8%
Additional Metrics (5)
⚖️ Concentration Risk
VWO: 29.8% in top 10
XLF: 55.7% in top 10
📊 Assets Under Management
VWO: $80B ✓
XLF: $40B
Sharpe Ratio
VWO: 0.22
XLF: 0.65
📉 Volatility
VWO: 21.5%
XLF: 21.5%
🔍 Uniqueness vs SPY
VWO: 100.0% unique
XLF: 86.3% unique

Bottom line: VWO wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VWO for your portfolio, but XLF is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

0 shared holdings representing 0.0% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockVWO WeightXLF WeightOverlap
0
Shared Stocks
0.0%
Total Overlap
0
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in VWO

Unique to VWO

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor7.95%
BABAAlibaba Group4.45%
TCEHYTencent Holdings3.95%
PDDPDD Holdings2.65%
INFYInfosys Ltd2.25%

Top Holdings Only in XLF

Unique to XLF

Scroll horizontally to see all data
SymbolNameWeight
BRK-BBRK-B11.80%
JPMJPM10.82%
VV7.26%
MAMA5.81%
BACBAC4.78%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = Σ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

📊 This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on VWO or XLF?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs