VUG vs VOO: Complete Comparison

Vanguard Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
47.65%
Moderate Overlap
Shared Holdings
10 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

VUG
VOO
47.6%
VUG Only
Overlap
VOO Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

VUG Return
+8.88%
VOO Return
+8.55%
Winner
VUG
+0.34%
Max Drawdown
VUG: -7.4%
VOO: -5.1%
VUG Volatility (annualized)15.27%
VOO Volatility (annualized)11.37%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
VUG
VOO
1 Year Return
+32.5%โœ“
+26.5%
3 Year Return
+13.8%โœ“
+10.2%
5 Year Return
+19.5%โœ“
+15.8%
Volatility
21.20%
18.20%โœ“
Expense Ratio
0.04%
0.03%โœ“
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
VUG
VOO
Volatility
21.20%
18.20%โœ“
Sharpe Ratio
0.90โœ“
0.82
Sortino Ratio
1.25โœ“
1.15
Max Drawdown
-36.80%
-33.80%โœ“
Beta
1.12
1.00

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

5 - 9

๐Ÿ† VOO wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
VUG:0.04%โœ“
vs
VOO:0.03%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
VUG:285 holdingsโœ“
vs
VOO:503 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
VUG:+19.5%โœ“
vs
VOO:+15.8%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
VUG: 60.6% in top 10
VOO: 39.6% in top 10โœ“
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
VUG: $130B โœ“
VOO: $380B โœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
VUG: 0.90
VOO: 0.82
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
VUG: 21.2%
VOO: 18.2%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
VUG: 60.9% uniqueโœ“
VOO: 18.4% unique

Bottom line: VOO wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VOO for your portfolio, but VUG is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

10 shared holdings representing 47.6% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockVUG WeightVOO WeightOverlap
1
NVDA
NVIDIA Corp
9.25%7.37%7.37%
2
AAPL
Apple Inc
12.85%7.07%7.07%
3
MSFT
Microsoft Corp
11.85%6.24%6.24%
4
AMZN
Amazon.com Inc
6.85%3.86%3.86%
5
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc Class A
3.85%3.18%3.18%
6
AVGO
Broadcom Inc
2.65%3.24%2.65%
7
GOOG
Alphabet Inc Class C
3.25%2.55%2.55%
8
META
Meta Platforms Inc
4.65%2.40%2.40%
9
TSLA
Tesla Inc
2.95%2.06%2.06%
10
LLY
Eli Lilly and Co
2.45%1.46%1.46%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
7 stocks ยท 31.46% overlap
Consumer Discretionary
2 stocks ยท 5.92% overlap
Healthcare
1 stocks ยท 1.46% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

10
Shared Stocks
47.6%
Total Overlap
3
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in VOO

Unique to VOO

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
BRK-BBRK-B1.61%
JPMJPM1.40%
VV0.96%
JNJJNJ0.85%
XOMXOM0.84%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on VUG or VOO?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Related Articles

Compare More ETFs