VTV vs XLV: Complete Comparison

Vanguard Value ETF vs Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
20.88%
Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
3 of 10
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

VTV
XLV
20.9%
VTV Only
Overlap
XLV Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

VTV Return
+7.51%
XLV Return
-5.00%
Winner
VTV
+12.50%
Max Drawdown
VTV: -6.4%
XLV: -10.5%
VTV Volatility (annualized)11.25%
XLV Volatility (annualized)14.99%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
VTV
XLV
1 Year Return
+20.2%โœ“
+12.5%
3 Year Return
+7.8%โœ“
+6.8%
5 Year Return
+12.5%โœ“
+11.2%
Volatility
16.80%
15.80%โœ“
Expense Ratio
0.04%โœ“
0.10%
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
VTV
XLV
Volatility
16.80%
15.80%โœ“
Sharpe Ratio
0.68
0.68
Sortino Ratio
0.95
0.95
Max Drawdown
-35.50%
-25.20%โœ“
Beta
0.88
0.72

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

12 - 1

๐Ÿ† VTV wins this comparison

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
VTV:0.04%โœ“
vs
XLV:0.10%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
VTV:337 holdingsโœ“
vs
XLV:64 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
VTV:+12.5%
vs
XLV:+11.2%
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
VTV: 28.0% in top 10โœ“
XLV: 57.5% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
VTV: $115B โœ“โœ“
XLV: $35B
โšก Sharpe Ratio
VTV: 0.68
XLV: 0.68
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
VTV: 16.8%
XLV: 15.8%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
VTV: 92.9% uniqueโœ“
XLV: 90.5% unique

Bottom line: VTV wins with better expense ratio and number of holdings. Consider VTV for your portfolio, but XLV is still a solid choice if you prefer its specific advantages.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

3 shared holdings representing 20.9% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockVTV WeightXLV WeightOverlap
1
UNH
UnitedHealth Group
2.85%5.38%2.85%
2
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.65%8.84%2.65%
3
ABBV
AbbVie Inc
1.85%7.23%1.85%

Overlap by Sector

Healthcare
3 stocks ยท 7.35% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

3
Shared Stocks
20.9%
Total Overlap
1
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in VTV

Unique to VTV

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Class B4.85%
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co3.85%
XOMExxon Mobil Corp3.25%
VVisa Inc2.45%
PGProcter & Gamble2.25%

Top Holdings Only in XLV

Unique to XLV

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
LLYLLY14.33%
MRKMRK4.44%
TMOTMO3.90%
ABTABT3.87%
ISRGISRG3.67%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on VTV or XLV?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs