VOOV vs XLK: Complete Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF vs Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund โ€” overlap, correlation, performance & risk analysis

Holdings Overlap
29.42%
Low Overlap
Shared Holdings
37 of 70
Complete portfolio analysis
Calculation Method
Min Weight
Weighted intersection

Visual Overlap

VOOV
XLK
29.4%
VOOV Only
Overlap
XLK Only

Price Performance

Historical price comparison over 3M

VOOV Return
+5.06%
XLK Return
+27.44%
Winner
XLK
+22.38%
Max Drawdown
VOOV: -6.3%
XLK: -14.5%
VOOV Volatility (annualized)10.79%
XLK Volatility (annualized)25.45%

๐Ÿ“ˆ Comparison

Metric
VOOV
XLK
1 Year Return
+20.2%
+35.2%โœ“
3 Year Return
+7.5%
+15.8%โœ“
5 Year Return
+12.5%
+25.5%โœ“
Volatility
17.20%โœ“
24.20%
Expense Ratio
0.07%โœ“
0.10%
โš ๏ธ Past performance does not guarantee future results. Data may be delayed.

โš ๏ธRisk Metrics

Metric
VOOV
XLK
Volatility
17.20%โœ“
24.20%
Sharpe Ratio
0.68
1.05โœ“
Sortino Ratio
0.92
1.42โœ“
Max Drawdown
-36.50%โœ“
-38.50%
Beta
0.90
1.22

Interpretation:

  • ๐Ÿ“Š Lower volatility = smoother ride
  • โšก Higher Sharpe/Sortino = better risk-adjusted returns
  • โš ๏ธ Smaller max drawdown = less worst-case pain
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Beta > 1 = more volatile than S&P 500

โš”๏ธ Comparison

10 - 10

Key Factors

๐Ÿ’ฐ Expense Ratio
VOOV:0.07%โœ“
vs
XLK:0.10%โœ“
๐ŸŽฏ Number of Holdings
VOOV:390 holdingsโœ“
vs
XLK:65 holdingsโœ“
๐Ÿ“ˆ 5-Year Return
VOOV:+12.5%โœ“
vs
XLK:+25.5%โœ“
โ–ถAdditional Metrics (5)
โš–๏ธ Concentration Risk
VOOV: 30.2% in top 10โœ“
XLK: 62.3% in top 10
๐Ÿ“Š Assets Under Management
VOOV: $8B
XLK: $55B โœ“โœ“
โšก Sharpe Ratio
VOOV: 0.68
XLK: 1.05โœ“
๐Ÿ“‰ Volatility
VOOV: 17.2%โœ“
XLK: 24.2%
๐Ÿ” Uniqueness vs SPY
VOOV: 51.1% unique
XLK: 65.5% uniqueโœ“

Bottom line: VOOV and XLK are very similar. Choose based on your broker's commission structure or personal preference.

Detailed Overlap Analysis

37 shared holdings representing 29.4% portfolio overlap

Top Shared Holdings

#StockVOOV WeightXLK WeightOverlap
1
AAPL
AAPL
8.29%13.10%8.29%
2
MSFT
MSFT
7.07%11.75%7.07%
3
AMD
AMD
1.59%2.96%1.59%
4
CSCO
CSCO
1.11%2.60%1.11%
5
MU
MU
0.96%2.72%0.96%
6
ADBE
ADBE
0.32%1.25%0.32%
7
TEL
TEL
0.28%0.58%0.28%
8
GLW
GLW
0.27%0.59%0.27%
9
STX
STX
0.21%0.53%0.21%
10
WDC
WDC
0.20%0.52%0.20%

Overlap by Sector

Technology
10 stocks ยท 19.90% overlap
Other
27 stocks ยท 2.73% overlap

Showing top 5 sectors by overlap contribution

37
Shared Stocks
29.4%
Total Overlap
2
Sectors Represented

Top Holdings Only in VOOV

Unique to VOOV

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
AMZNAMZN3.81%
XOMXOM1.87%
JNJJNJ1.74%
BRK-BBRK-B1.71%
JPMJPM1.41%

Top Holdings Only in XLK

Unique to XLK

โ†Scroll horizontally to see all dataโ†’
SymbolNameWeight
NVDANVDA14.84%
AVGOAVGO5.36%
PLTRPLTR3.75%
ORCLORCL2.81%
IBMIBM2.41%

Price Correlation

How We Calculate Overlap

We use the minimum weight method with normalization to calculate portfolio overlap:

Overlap = ฮฃ min(weightA, weightB) for each shared holding

Normalization: Holdings weights are normalized to sum to 100% before comparison. This ensures accurate overlap calculations even when analyzing partial holdings data (e.g., top 50 positions).

Conservative approach: We consider only the smaller allocation for each shared position, giving you a realistic view of true portfolio overlap.

๐Ÿ“Š This analysis is based on publicly available holdings data. For the most current and complete holdings information, please visit the official ETF provider websites.

Want deeper analysis on VOOV or XLK?

Complement your EigenDex analysis with these research tools.

Some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support EigenDex as a free tool. We only recommend tools we believe provide genuine value to investors.

Compare More ETFs